Descriptions:
Video Description
Mark Passio turns natural law from theory into practice in this closing session. Taxation, prohibition, and permits are stripped of their polite language and shown for what many are afraid to name: theft and slavery. With a two-person planet as his test, Passio demonstrates that what is wrong for one person stays wrong for a crowd — rights cannot be created, delegated, or voted into existence.
The remedy is spiritual rebellion, not street revolution. The path out runs through a simple word people have forgotten how to say — “no” — through shadow work, through reclaiming personal responsibility, and through teaching the Great Work so others can wake up too. What begins as a lecture ends as an initiation into your own freedom.
Full Video Transcript
Okay, so we ended before the dinner break. I hope everyone enjoyed their dinner at the concept that if there is no victim, if no actual wrongdoing has taken place resulting in harm to someone else, there is no crime.
And many people are, you know, being jailed for victimless crimes that they’ve actually never actually harmed another being and yet their freedom has been taken away.
Another aspect about this concept of the difference between right and wrong behavior is we have to understand that there is no such thing as the ability to delegate a wrong to someone else. No one can say to someone, you may harm him unchallenged or unaccosted, okay? That you’re allowed to do that morally, okay?
no more than anybody can say a group of people may commit a wrongdoing, and they have the moral
right to commit it, to commit that wrongdoing. There’s no such thing as that, okay? So this is
what many people who believe in things like government believe in, that we can delegate
to a group of people who are calling themselves a government something that is not a right,
and agree, all come together and agree upon, they now possess this right. Rights can’t be
granted by human beings to other human beings. Everybody is born with the same
rights because rights don’t come from human beings. Rights, like the laws of
nature, come from the creator of the universe. They don’t come from human
beings. Human beings don’t make up what right and wrong are. Right and wrong are
inherent to creation and are up to us to discover and recognize what they are and
then live in accordance with those principles. So if a specific action is
not a right for any individual. That action cannot be, quote, delegated, granted, or licensed to any
other individual or group and magically called a right. It does not become a right. If it’s wrong,
it remains a wrong, no matter how many people believe they can do it or delegate it or otherwise.
Similarly, a right can’t be turned into a wrong. If it’s a right and you’re not harming somebody
by doing it, somebody can’t magically say, well, that’s a wrong and you’re not allowed to do that.
And yet we have things that go right hand in hand with that and it’s called government.
An action that is a wrong would forever remain a wrong under natural law.
So how do we know what rights are?
Part of knowing rights is understand that natural law, the difference between right
and wrong, always holds true regardless of a population’s belief system.
Like natural law being in effect, the difference between right and wrong are not dependent
on anybody’s belief. They are eternal truths that need to be understood. So this means it does not
matter how many people agree that a wrong can be turned into a right or that a right can be turned
into a wrong. Such things can never be done in reality. We can believe we can do that and act
like that, but in reality it cannot actually be done. A right forever remains a right, a wrong
forever remains a wrong. People can only believe that they can claim such reversals and that this
will magically make it so.
Unfortunately, most human beings erroneously believe that it is morally possible for them
to create and delegate rights, quote unquote, which do not exist, or to take away actual
rights from people which do exist.
They believe we can do that.
So when in doubt as to whether an action is or is not in harmony with natural law, the
visualization exercise that I always ask people to do is to imagine a scenario of
a planet a world where there is only two people where only two people exist on an
entire planet okay if the behavior in that circumstance in that visualized
instance is either a right or a wrong in that instance it remains a right or a
or a wrong in any size population,
regardless of how many people may believe otherwise, okay?
So if a right is a right for one person
to do toward another, okay,
or if it’s a wrong, the action is a wrong
for one person to take toward another,
population is irrelevant.
People will say, well, yeah,
if there was a couple of people, that would be okay,
but if in a world of seven billion people,
we can’t let people do that.
Well, this has nothing to do with what right and wrong is,
you know, as if they’re changeable.
Let’s look at this scenario.
So there’s our world, and there’s two people, okay?
Two well-groomed businessmen.
And we’re gonna look at an instance.
Let’s look at taxation, the concept of taxation.
Is taxation of any kind a right or a wrong?
Is it morally acceptable and justifiable?
Or is it something that is actually a wrong?
So let’s look at what taxation really is.
And again, we’re not gonna euphemize.
We’re gonna talk about it straight on.
So here’s what taxation is.
It’s not what I believe it is.
I’m getting down to the heart of the matter
and describing what it actually is.
Taxation is the claim that a specific group of people
who call themselves government have been given a quote right.
They’ve been delegated a right, okay?
We’ve written down a law and we say this people
calling themselves government and the IRS
have a right to do this particular action,
this activity, okay, this behavior.
They’ve been given the right to confiscate,
unwillingly I might add,
an arbitrarily chosen percentage
of the product of another individual’s labor.
Now let me just start with this, right?
You ask anybody,
how many are you gonna voluntarily pay more taxes?
Nobody will raise their hand.
And you say, why not?
Well, because I can barely afford
to pay the ones I’m paying now
and I don’t wanna volunteer any more money
toward that endeavor.
Quite frankly, I want my resources for myself
to use as I see fit voluntarily.
But if the government then said,
well, your taxes are going up by 5%,
how many people would pay them?
Most people would.
Because subconsciously or consciously,
they recognize this is, they’re under coercion.
They’re actually under duress.
They’re being told that if they don’t give this
at the command of the people who are confiscating it,
that some form of violence will be conducted upon them,
whether through the form of finding them
and saying we’re gonna take more of your resources,
whether by saying we’re gonna throw you in a cage
and make you stay there for as long as we say
you need to stay there, okay?
Or by actually conducting actual physical harm upon them.
So again, we’re saying that this quote unquote right
is given to individuals who call themselves government
and then they have the right to confiscate
this arbitrarily chosen percentage of the product
out of another individual’s labor.
because that’s what money is, okay?
Or that’s what, you know,
whatever we make through what we work,
that’s the product of our labor.
We work and then we get compensated for it.
So that’s an exchange for labor that we have done.
That’s our property,
because we gave labor in return for that.
So this is done whether or not the other agrees
to share that product voluntarily.
It’s not a voluntary process.
Coercion is involved.
Taxation is enforced by the threat of violence,
which is behavior that will result in bodily harm, or imprisonment, which is the taking away
of physical freedom of movement, if those from whom the product is being seized attempt to resist
this confiscation. This practice is always, quote, justified, and the word justify actually breaks
down etymologically. It means, the word justify means to create a right. That’s what justify
actually means. Ius in Latin means right or law. And then facere means to create or to make.
So to justify means to create right, to make a right up and conjure it into existence.
So it’s always justified or made into a right, quote unquote, by those who claim that such a
practice is necessary and required to quote unquote uphold the common good. This is the
justification offered for the seizure of the product of people’s labor involuntarily. Now if
we are honest with ourselves, if we define the concept of slavery, and I think this is a good
definition for slavery, would it be fair to say slavery is the involuntary confiscation of 100%
of the product of the labor of another human being that be a fair definition you’re saying
you’re working i’m going to take whatever you generate as a result of that work that you’re
doing it doesn’t belong to you the product of your labor doesn’t belong to you all of it belongs to
me so you work for me i take everything that you have been able to amass or create through the
labor that you have done i think everybody here would agree that’s slavery that’s a good as a
definition of slavery as you’re probably going to get. I mean, we can come up with some other
definitions that involve coercion and physically shackling and keeping people. But if we really
are honest with ourselves, what is the purpose of slavery to begin with is to make others work
for free and then take all of the product of the labor. That’s what slavery was conducted for.
Okay. So if we’re defining slavery as the involuntary confiscation of 100% of the product
of the labor of another human being, we should be able to clearly see that there is no magical
percentage to which we could lower this number that would no longer make it slavery. So I ask
people, if the person who’s saying I’m going to confiscate 100% of your labor and keep it for
myself would say, well, I’m going to take 75%. I’ll take three quarters. You can keep a quarter
of what you’ve created. Would that no longer constitute slavery? And I don’t care what you
say I’m going to use the 75% for? Okay. If you’re telling somebody you have no choice, 75% of your
labor belongs to me. Would that no longer be slavery just because they allow them to keep 25?
Okay. Let’s lower it to 50. Is it still slavery? Okay. Well, what percentage could it possibly be
lowered to for it not to be slavery anymore? Only zero. There is no percentage that it could be
lowered to for it not to constitute slavery. And again, if we’re being honest with ourselves,
Many people want to justify this in many ways by saying, oh, it’s used for services,
services which someone doesn’t have a right to refuse.
I tell people, hey, if I said to you, I’m a computer technician.
You own a computer?
Okay, I’m now your computer technician.
You’re not allowed to refuse my services.
Just think about that for a moment.
You may not refuse that I am now providing the service for your computer
to keep it in good shape.
okay first of all what have I just taken from that gentleman right to choose free will right
there that’s slavery I don’t even have to keep going and say hey if you refuse or you know if
you whether you want or don’t want my computer services I’m now your technician and I need uh
two hundred dollars every year uh I’ll come over a couple of times I don’t care whether you’re
happy with my service or not okay and if you don’t pay me I’m coming and taking the computer
now is that you’re really your property if you’re living under that kind of
duress or am I just a violent criminal who’s saying I’m gonna steal your stuff
if you don’t give me what I say I’m holding you under extortion that’s
duress that’s called duress it means I am threatening violence unto the person
unless they conform to my will and that’s what we’re all held under we’re
held under duress all forms of tactic taxation are duress it is a master class
Yes, telling people you have no right to refuse the arbitrarily set confiscation of your labor that I deem is going to be necessary for what I say it’s necessary for.
So how could you possibly claim that your home belongs to you if you’re paying something called a property tax?
That somebody is saying, for the services we provide in this community, you must pay us this percentage, and if you don’t pay it, your house is going to be turned over to the government.
You know what that’s called? There’s a term for that. When a society doesn’t actually have true private property ownership rights and a higher class of masters actually owns the land and owns the property and only allows the peasant class to live upon the property for as long as they pay tribute to the master class,
who can tell me what system of government that is that’s called feudalism and that’s the that’s
the united states government and just about every government on the earth you live in feudalism
there’s no such thing as democracy there’s certainly not a constitutional republic that’s
for sure okay the state of the de facto state of government which means indeed in action is
feudalism and feudalism is just another euphemism it’s a euphemism for slavery okay because slaves
Slaves aren’t allowed to own property.
Slaves aren’t allowed to keep the product of their labor.
That’s all it really is.
If we’re being honest with ourselves, once again, there’s my catchphrase for this section.
We want to euphemize it, justify it, call it something else.
I said this to that new age woman at the UFO conference and she said, again, I prefer not
to see it that way.
Well, you’re not being honest with yourself.
You’re lying.
It’s called lying to yourself.
what cognitive dissonance is. It’s called lying to yourself, okay? So if we’re being honest with
ourselves, taxation is merely a euphemism for theft, violence, and slavery, the practices upon
which it is actually based. And since no individual anywhere on earth has the right to claim ownership
of the product of another’s labor, such behavior can never be, quote, delegated to a group of people
and called a right. Therefore, it follows logically that all forms of taxation, I don’t care what they
are excise tax property tax you know gift tax inheritance tax income tax I
don’t care what form it is taxes on corporations even okay all forms of
taxation are always wrong according to natural law because they are all based
in the destruction of free will they are based on coercion and they are ultimately
based upon violence all of which are wrongdoings all of which are forms of
theft and all of which not one individual has the right to perform upon another and this is what
people want to justify and believe can be magically turned into a right just because they want to
euphemize it and call it taxation let’s look at another example prohibition one of my favorite
it’s one of my pet peeves okay you know i’m big into health into eating right okay i’m huge into
juicing you know it’s one of my favorite things to do um purification of the body is part of
purification of the mind all right but i’m going to tell you i’m 100 for anybody being allowed to
put anything into their body because they own their body if i want to chew it break up this
remote control in little pieces and eat it with a sprinkling of pepper then that’s my right to do so
regardless of what the chips may do to my intestinal tract, okay?
There’s a reason I have the right to eat this remote if I want to.
You want to know why?
My body is my property.
It belongs to me.
Now, we did this in the natural law seminar.
We asked people, do you own your own body?
Almost every single student in the seminar,
now, of course, they immediately answered, yes, I own my own body.
The students grasped this, okay?
The people they were asking the questions to, because the students were doing the tabulation
of accumulating the answers from people that they asked the questions to.
One of the questions I asked them to ask people is, do you own your own body?
Almost every student in my first natural law seminar, when they asked people if they owned
their own body, they came back to the next class and almost every student said, almost
everybody they asked that question to paused for a long time
and thought about it had to sit and think about this question
could not immediately spit out absolutely my body is my property
you know because I think people want to overthink things and say well
am I going to own my body forever I’m going to die one day does that mean I don’t own it now
you know what’s the over intellectualization
and mystification of this concept I tell people I recognize fully I’m going to
die one day and this flesh is going to crumble and pass into the earth. Does that mean I don’t
own my body right now? I’m using my body right now. That’s why I own it specifically. Specifically
because my consciousness inhabits this body and I’m using it as the vehicle for the expression
of my consciousness is the very reason I own my body. And people can’t spit that out. It’s
like unfathomable to me. The ridiculousness of some of this that the human mind could be worked
into the situation that it has been is almost incomprehensible. So let’s go
forward with prohibition. It’s the claim that a group of people who call
themselves government have been given the right to prevent others from putting
any given substance into their own bodies and if others refuse to comply
with those terms that they will be fined or imprisoned. And it should be
self-evident that if an individual’s body is actually their own property, and
it is then then that individual always maintains the natural right to decide
what will or will not be put into their property which is their body why can you
put what you want into your car or your home because you own it it’s your
property okay technically it should be I mean you know technically it isn’t
really but my whole point is nobody else can tell no other individual can tell
you what you can and can’t put into your home okay you know you know can I tell
you, hey, I don’t want you putting that jacket in your car. You’re not allowed to put it in there.
Well, who am I to tell you you’re not allowed to put that in there? It’s your property, okay? So
why would we accept that? Not accept that, but we would accept I can’t put something in my own body
that I deem that I want in it, okay? Because people can’t separate the act of imbibing the
substance or putting the substance into the body, okay, from the action that people may subsequently
take and they’re two different things so somebody might go out and want to get smashed tonight and
do a bunch of drinking but if you then go out on the street and start clubbing somebody with the
nearest available blunt object you don’t have a right to do that you had a right to go drinking
okay any more than you would have a right to go snort some cocaine or bang some heroin into your
arm okay i don’t think those two things are particularly good ideas but i support your right
to do it but hey if after you do those things you go and hurt somebody else you got to be held
accountable for the actions you just took. That’s what personal responsibility is all about. And
these two things need to be delineated from each other. We have to clearly be able to separate the
act of the right to put something into my body and me still being personally responsible for
what I do with my body, okay? So understanding that this is a claim made to tell people that
I’m going to make the decision about what you put into your body, we can easily see this claim
of this right to command what will or will not be put into the body of another person,
what it actually amounts to is a claim of ownership upon the body of another person.
If I’m telling you you can’t drink orange juice, I’m making a claim your body belongs to me
because I’m going to decide what goes into it or what does not go into it, okay? So if I say
carrots are off limits for your consumption, sir, and they may not be ingested, I’ve just made a
claim that I own your body. Well, what’s the claim on the ownership of another person’s body called?
Slavery. If we’re not euphemizing it and if we’re being honest with ourselves, okay? Prohibition is
merely the claim of ownership upon another person’s body is called slavery. Therefore,
prohibition is merely a euphemism for slavery that is backed by violence regardless of the
justifications made by those who claim such practices are, quote, necessary for the common
good. That’s always the justification. Since no individual anywhere on earth has the right to
claim the ownership of another person’s body, such behavior can never be delegated to a group
and magically termed a right. Therefore, all forms of prohibition are always wrong according to
natural law. It doesn’t matter what the substance is. It doesn’t matter what it is, how destructive
it may be to the body or brain. Look, if I want to go under my sink, take some cleaning supplies
and make a nice cocktail with some lye
and some roach poison and some rat poison,
stir it up in a water solution
and go glug, glug, glug, glug, glug.
That’s my right.
Want to know why?
Because I own my body.
I own my consciousness and my body, period, the end.
So if I want to do that, that’s my right to do so.
Okay, nobody has a right to tell me
what I can and cannot put into my body.
Yeah, we accept this because of these justifications
that oh, it’s for the common good.
Forget what rights are.
you know, it’s for the common good, we need to accept slavery for the common good, yeah,
yeah, it works out like that, so how about licenses and permits, these are claims that a group of
people who call themselves government, and again, we’re going back and visualizing, imagine one
person trying to make this claim to another person, nobody would find it legitimate, nobody would find
that one person may make that claim to another person, yet we think these other people called
government have rights that individuals don’t have? That’s what we think. That’s called mind
control. Mind control is getting people to accept some people have rights that other people don’t
have. That’s what it is, you know? So go back to that visualization exercise. Can one person make
that claim over another and have it be legitimate? Of course not. So if nobody has that right, how
could that right be delegated to somebody else? It can’t. Licenses and permits, they’re claims that
a group of people who call themselves government have been given the right quote-unquote the right
to prevent others from exercising specific behaviors even if such behaviors cause no harm
to others or their property unless those others petition meaning beg or pay the government for
permission that’s what a permit is it means permission to be allowed to exercise those
behaviors this amounts to the claim that though that rights are actually merely
privileges that may be granted or revoked by government at any time okay
based upon the people in governments preference their discretion all right
remembering that the definition of a right is any action which does not cause
harm to another living being or their property there is no such thing as the
right quote-unquote to stop another person from exercising a right if if
something is a right meaning it doesn’t cause harm there is no such thing as
someone’s right to stop you from performing that action okay that would
be called coercion which is a wrong okay so the actual ingest ingestion of let’s
say marijuana for example harms no one else you can put that into your body sit
there perfectly peacefully and not cause harm to another living being that’s
called a right for the very specific definition that it caused no harm okay I
would not have the right to tell another individual you may not do that action
that would be a wrongdoing well it’s the same thing for something when it comes
the licenses and permits. You’re telling people, hey, if you pay me $50, I’ll let you smoke that
marijuana without doing violence to you, unless I change my mind. And then I won’t give you a
permit. I’ll just say, hey, you’re not allowed to do that. Even something that is a right,
like assembling and speaking, like what was done in the state of Pennsylvania a few years ago when
the G20 visited it in the city of Pittsburgh, okay? The city telling people, we have revoked
the right to assemble and speak and petition for grievances. You don’t have the right to come and
speak. No protests will be tolerated or will hit you with sound and water cannons, you know? And
people just laid down and accepted it. The whole city of Pittsburgh, you know? Because, oh, we’re
going to go and ask them for a permit. And they just said, no, no, you don’t have that right
anymore. We find you on the street, you’re getting blasted with a sound cannon and deafened. Some
people went permanently deaf, permanently deaf, lost their hearing from what happened in Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania. You see the stuff that was happening in, it wasn’t Egypt, where they were hitting
people with water cannons recently and killing some of them. It was in the Middle East somewhere,
turkey correct you know hitting people some people died getting hit in the eye with such
pressure hits the brain people are dead from water cannons they call these non-lethal weapons
because they’re telling you you may not speak you may not assemble we’re going to revoke that right
really see there is no right to stop someone from exercising a pre-existing right that’s that’s you
making the claim, I own your rights. That’s what that’s really doing. That’s saying, I’m God. I
get to grant what a right is or revoke what a right is in any given time. It’s basically what
it is. It amounts to someone claiming to be God. The claim over the rights of another person
is called slavery. Even more so, it is the claim to be God, the claim that the rights of another
flow from you. Therefore, licensing and permits are merely other euphemisms for slavery, regardless
of the justifications made by those who claim such practices are, quote, necessary for the
common good. Since no individual anywhere on earth, no single individual, has the right to
claim the ownership of another person’s rights, such behavior can never be delegated to a group
and magically called a right. Therefore, all forms of licensing and permits, according to natural law,
are always wrongdoings because they are always based in coercion and the theft of someone else’s
rights. So again, that’s the visualization exercise. There’s three quick examples. You have
to envision there’s only two people. Would one person have a right to conduct that action against
another? If the answer is no, there’s no such thing as calling it a right and delegating it
to other people and telling them now you’re allowed to perform that behavior. It’s always
a wrongdoing. But people, because of this idea, this mind control called government, want to
believe that that right exists, that we can delegate something that is a wrongdoing.
Force versus violence. We need to understand that these concepts are complete opposites of each
other. They are not the same. The terms should never be used interchangeably with each other
because not only are they not even remotely similar, they’re direct diametrically opposed
opposites. Let’s look at the difference. They’re often spoken about as if they’re the same and
they’re used interchangeably when in fact they are actually diametrically opposed to each other.
force the definition of force is the capacity to do work or cause physical
change in the physical world okay for any change to be created in the physical
world in any capacity force must be used and applied there’s nothing you can do
that doesn’t require force if you’re going to make a change happen in the
physical okay so to set up this equipment force was required we had to
lift it we had to set it up we have to plug in the cables force is required to
to do all those things.
It’s the capacity to perform physical activity,
physical work, okay?
Action, force is actually action which is in harmony
with morality and natural law because the taking of it,
the usage of it, doesn’t violate rights of other people.
So as soon as you’re stepping over the line
into coercive usage of force, that becomes violence.
The initiation of force for coercive reasons,
for coercive applications, becomes violence.
That’s what makes it violence.
Force itself is not violence.
As such, force is action which one always possesses
the natural right to take, and this includes the defense,
the physical defense of someone’s person, their body,
against the act of violence.
Force may be applied in that situation.
When you are accosted with violence,
you do reserve the right to use physical force
defensively against such an assault.
Violence, on the other hand,
and this is the key to keep in mind with violence,
it is the immoral initiation of physical power
to coerce, compel, or restrain, unrightfully.
No one has the right to ever enact violence
because violence is always starting it.
Initiation, that’s the key word there.
It’s the immoral, the unrightful initiation.
So, you know, teachers in schools will, you know,
if there’s a skirmish that happens
between a couple of male students one day,
they’ll say, it doesn’t matter who started it.
All that matters is who started it.
All that matters is who started it.
All that matters.
Because the person who actually conducted violence
is the person who struck first.
They initiated the immoral use of physical behavior,
physical force, physical power to coerce, compel, or restrain. Therefore, when the person beats back
that physical assault with force, they have not committed an additional wrongdoing, okay? It’s
difficult for many people to understand who are in right brain imbalance. They don’t want to
acknowledge that you maintain the natural right to use force when you are accosted with violent
behavior. If someone just came up to me on the street and started swinging, okay, because they
want something I have or just because they don’t like the look of me, for whatever reason,
they don’t have the right to do that.
If I replied by beating back their attack with sufficient force to put that action down,
how many wrongdoings would have been committed?
One.
Correct.
One.
Not two.
One.
Because I maintain the right to defend myself with physical power, with physical force when
when violence meaning someone else started the immoral behavior that’s what
matters the initiation who started it is all that matters all that matters and
again it’s a very difficult thing for the ego to comprehend the ego doesn’t
want to hear that it’s been conditioned so long that responding with force is
also violence we are verbally and mentally equating these two things and
when they in fact they are actual complete opposites if somebody if a kid
got hit by somebody else in a school and then that other kid said maybe even said
once stop what you’re doing and then when the other kid wouldn’t stop he
punched him and knocked him out okay I would ask other people who’s who who
struck first and if the kid lying on the floor struck first I’d say you got what
you deserved that’s it because that person had a right to defend themselves
you had no right to strike him you initiated the violence he responded with
defensive force. Many people don’t want to hear that because they’re very conditioned. And I’m
not saying you have to do that. You also reserve the right not to do that. But the right does exist.
Both things, both rights exist. You would have the right to not respond with physical force,
but you would have the right to respond with physical force. See, that’s a free will decision
that the person has the right to choose between those actions. I don’t even look at either one
of them is the high road. Personally, I think if somebody keeps beating somebody and keeps
conducting violence to them and the other person keeps accepting it and never rebels against it
and never uses any force to put it down, I almost look at that as the low road. I’m not a pacifist.
Not a pacifist. I am 100% about nonviolence, meaning don’t initiate harm to other people.
don’t start it don’t start none won’t be none in street lingo that’s how that’s how it really is
okay but if somebody else starts it they’re asking to be put down with the amount of physical force
that is required to put down the act of aggression violence is coercive action see that’s the key
it’s always coercion saying you’re going to do what i want you to do or then i’m going to strike
then i’m going to commit the act of violence it’s coercive it’s action which is always in
opposition to morality and natural law for the very reason that it involves the violation of
others’ rights. That’s why it’s called violence. It’s a violation. The act of violation caused,
it resulted in violence. Your rights have been violated. That’s why it’s called violence.
It’s the same root word. Violence is action which one never possesses the right to take,
ever. There is no such thing as the right to commit violence doesn’t exist because violence
is the immortal initiation of physical power to compel, coerce, restrain, which no one has the
right to do. No, you don’t have the right. No one does have the right to initiate that type of
action. Force, on the other hand, there is a time and a place to exert that force in a defensive
capacity. All right, so we’ll talk about that here. This piece of trash comes up to somebody
on the street and says, give me all, everything that’s valuable. I want your shoes. Oh, they’re
leather. Take them off. Take the wallet out. All the jewelry. Give me your purse. Give me your
wallet. Okay. It’s called a thug. Nobody would believe he has the authority or the right to do
that. And we would have the moral obligation to obey this criminal. You know, if the criminal
started calling himself government, we might start believing it. Right. But let’s say, let’s say
Somebody on the street saw what was being done, took out their own 9mm and blew this
guy away.
How many acts of violence were committed?
One.
One.
But I understand.
But again, that’s somebody saying, I prefer not to see it that way.
Again, perception and reality do not really align in many cases.
They’re not the same.
That person is incorrectly perceiving what is.
They’re not seeing the truth.
people don’t want to hear that that’s the truth because they’re very conditioned and they are
very well-behaved slaves you know as harsh as that is to say they don’t want to understand that the
inherent right to use force against violence exists and is always our right always now i’m
not telling you go out immediately do that either because the perception is so screwed up in the
body of humanity that the majority of people don’t believe that would be a right and they’ll
persecute you for doing it. You see, the self-defense principle is continuously being
eroded. Human beings possess the natural right to defend themselves from violence with defensive
physical force. A person who is accosted by violence possesses the right to stop the person
who is conducting the violence from continuing to do harm to them with any amount of force that is
necessary to stop the attack or the assault, okay, up to and including deadly force. I would say
if you want to be nice about it, give the person one verbal warning to stop. Say no once. After
that, it’s on. That’s it. And that’s really my policy, okay? That would be my policy on the
street with an individual. The problem is here, the so-called authorities of the government,
like you say don’t want to see it that way and they’re constantly trying to take this right away
from somebody they’re constantly trying to say no we own the monopoly on the usage of force and all
you may do is wait and be accosted and assaulted until one of us shows up well you know what that’s
called it’s called a big crock of bullshit is what that’s called and it shouldn’t be accepted by
anyone who has any common sense shouldn’t be accepted by anyone unfortunately again like i
said, people are very, very well conditioned. And they think that this is an example of two
wrongs don’t make a right. There’s no two wrongs committed there. There’s one wrong committed,
and then there’s a right that is being exercised. Big difference between exercising a right that
involves the defensive use of force and committing a wrongdoing, which involves the initiation of
violence. And people got to get clear on this. They have to get clear on it. So the question
becomes, does violence magically become a right when it’s conducted by government? When they shut
down people’s free speech rights and assembly rights? Or when they conduct direct theft from
people through what’s this euphemized form of slavery called taxation? And like I said, I’m not
asking you to accept or believe taxation is slavery. I’m telling you, if you don’t understand
that, you’re wrong. I don’t care what you think. I’m telling you it is that way in truth and in
reality. Taxation, slavery. Shutting down of people’s rights is slavery. Telling people what
they may or may not put in their body is slavery. It’s not my perception. That’s what is, okay?
And that’s what we’re accepting as a people. We’re accepting that. These people have no more right to
do it than any other individual would. And this concept brings us to what my, the way I try to
define and explain to people what real spiritual enlightenment is. Because what the new age
community is telling you that an enlightened being looks like is equally as a big crock of bull
of what people who don’t understand self-defense, the self-defense principle, believe. Enlightenment
is not what this new age nonsense community is trying to tell people that it is. It’s not about
not taking action and sitting under a tree and meditating until you’re magically enlightened.
Enlightenment means knowing what’s going on around you.
Enlightenment means knowing what’s going on within you.
Enlightenment means truly knowing the true objective difference between right and wrong
and living that in your life on a daily basis.
Enlightenment means not aggressing upon your fellow human beings,
but not agreeing voluntarily to be aggressed upon by them either.
okay there’s two pillars two dynamics that go hand in hand with real enlightenment i call this
the two pillars of enlightenment okay so here they are the first pillar is the sacred feminine
principle this has been called the non-aggression principle all right it is the simple simple law
of don’t engage in violence or quite simply put don’t steal don’t steal we talked about that
That’s what all spiritual law can be boiled down to.
Don’t steal from other people.
Don’t take what isn’t yours.
Don’t take life that isn’t yours.
Don’t take property that isn’t yours.
Don’t take rights that aren’t yours.
They’re the property of others.
Respect their ownership.
Most people can grasp this pretty readily.
And even in the New Age movement, they grasped this.
In other words, don’t immorally initiate non-rightful use of physical power
to coerce, constrain, or compel the rightful physical behavior or free will choice of another
sentient being. Respect other people’s free will, their rights, their property, their life, period.
Real simple. It’s the golden rule. Don’t do things to other people that you don’t want done to you.
I always state it in the apophatic, in the negative. It’s much more powerful that way.
But there is a second principle, a second pillar or tenet of enlightenment, if you will. This is
the sacred masculine principle. This is what religions of the world, whether they be governments,
organized religion of different regions of the world and cultures, the new age movement,
all right, this is what they want, they are seeking to suppress because religions are right
brain modalities. They’re right brain methods of mind control. Just like government who thinks
it’s a monopoly on the physical use of force, that’s a left brain imbalanced mindset, all right?
The second pillar of enlightenment is the sacred masculine principle, which is also known as the self-defense principle.
Your body is your property. You have a right to defend it when it comes under attack by violence.
This principle states sentient beings have the inherent right to use force to defend themselves from violence conducted upon them by another.
This is the part many people don’t get.
You know, that’s why we’re not rebelling against our slave keepers, our slave masters who are
masters of other people in their own sick, distorted, psychopathic minds and are nothing
but thugs and criminals that people magically believe have the moral authority to continue to
do what they’re doing just because they euphemize slavery and call it government now. That’s the
sacred masculine principle. There is no such thing as an enlightened being that doesn’t fully grasp
both of these principles anywhere never has been there’s no such thing as half measures you got to
get them fully both or you’re not there and that’s the problem we’re not all the way there if people
were already there they wouldn’t be tolerating what we’re putting up with more more aggression
against people’s rights is being conducted in this country than when the founders of this nation
actually separated from england and they would have been horrified i tell people look to not to
get nasty but I tell people if the founders of this country could magically
come back to life somehow and see what’s going on in this country they take a
piss on people that’s what they would do that’s how much disrespect they would
have for what we’re putting up with you know again just to just say it the way
it really is that’s what they would want to do to us because they would tell us
we warn you about all this we warn you about it all and you know what you did
you ignored it ignored it so what did all those people who died in that
revolution die for we have to understand true ownership real deeply not
peripherally super deeply we got to know what we own and what we don’t own we
have to understand why is this our current condition that’s the question we
asked at the beginning and here’s the reason the reason our species to
continues to experience a systematic and growing loss of freedom is because we
collectively do not deeply understand ownership and we continue to commit and condone theft.
This is a prison for thieves. That’s what earth is. It’s a prison for people that don’t want to
respect ownership. They want to take things that aren’t theirs. And that’s what we’re here to learn.
We’re here to learn that there’s only one natural law. Stop stealing from other people. Stop taking
things that you don’t own. Stop condoning theft of things that other people don’t own. Don’t condone
that activity, that behavior either. So what is ownership? What’s the definition? What does it
entail? To own a thing means that regarding that thing, an individual maintains three basic things
regarding it. The first is rightful possession. It means you acquired it without doing harm to
somebody else. So you rightfully own it, lawfully own it, okay? You’re in possession of it. You have
it in your possession. It is yours. The second thing is you control its usage, okay? So your
house, you control its usage. Your car, you control its usage. Your clothes, you control
their usage. My computer is mine. I control its usage. I’m using it, okay? Control of the usage
of something means that you own it. And most of all, maintaining personal responsibility for that
possession is the third aspect of ownership. So to own something means I’m in lawful, rightful
possession of it. I control the usage of that thing and I maintain personal responsibility for
it. All right. And this is what we have to understand. Natural law can be essentially
reduced to one single spiritual law. I gave you the working definition, the soundbite definition
before. Here’s the super simplified two word concrescence of all of this information. Natural
law gets boiled down to two words. Don’t steal. That’s it. You want the key out of the prison,
you got to understand property. You got to understand all rights are property rights.
Stop taking the property of other beings. Stop condoning the taking of the property of other
beings. The end. I could just get up here and say, don’t steal. The end. Everybody go home.
Should be that simple. That’s the key, folks. That’s the key to the prison door. And what we’re
really talking about here is common sense. That’s what conscience is. People don’t think of
conscience as common sense. You know, they don’t think of conscience as knowledge. Conscience is
knowledge. It’s not action. It’s not behavior. It’s knowledge. Again, knowledge is the way out
of this, okay? And this is the knowledge that has to be developed. Conscience comes from the Latin
prefix con, meaning together, and the Latin verb sciere, meaning to know or to understand. You put
together, to know together, to understand together. Conscience is common sense. Common sense knowing.
Common sense knowledge. Literally, from the etymological breakdown of the word, con together,
science to know. That’s why the problem is people don’t have common sense. That’s why I’m sitting
there almost laughing hysterically that I need to try to teach common sense to people. The
ridiculousness of it. What we all need to be doing is doing that work, you know? I know you guys get
a lot of this. We need to start reaching out to other people. I’m going to talk about that in a
moment. Conscience, the definition of it, is the definitive knowledge of the objective difference
between right and wrong according to natural law. Objective, definitive, okay? It’s not up for debate.
It exists inherently and objectively. It can be understood, known, discovered. This is different
from action. Conscience is the knowledge. Then we act upon it, okay? So it’s different from
understanding something and acting upon it, right? To have conscience is to have common sense. It’s
to know the difference between right and wrong and understand that difference deeply. Then we’re
going to convert that into action. We exercise conscience. The exercise of conscience is actually
action. The exercise of conscience is the free will choice of right action over wrong action
once the definitive knowledge of the objective difference between right and wrong according to
natural law has been acquired and integrated into the being we acquire that knowledge first
understand it then we act in either accordance with it or disharmony with it if we act in
accordance with it it’s called the exercise of conscience that’s action the law of freedom this
is one of the basic laws within the body of natural law it’s real simple the law of freedom
states that freedom and morality are directly proportional. It’s a mathematical equation
that works 100% of the time flawlessly. As morality increases, freedom increases.
As morality declines, freedom declines. This means the more moral a population is,
the freer it becomes. The more immoral a population is, the deeper into bondage and
slavery it goes. Another way of saying this is to say that the presence of truth and morality
in the lives of the people of any given society is always inversely proportional to the presence
of tyranny and slavery in that society. The more truth and morality there is, the less
tyranny and slavery there is. The less truth and morality there is, the more tyranny and slavery
there is. That’s the law of freedom. And many people don’t want to understand that. That these
two things are inextricably interwoven and connected and can never be separated from each
other. The presence of truth and morality in a society and the presence of freedom or its lack
in a society. True freedom can never exist in a society that embraces moral relativism, which is
the idea that there is no inherent and objective difference between right and wrong. So humanity
he may just arbitrarily create or decide right and wrong for themselves that’s
the ideology called moral relativism as I’ve said before it is the second tenet
of the satanic religion and it is deeply entrenched in this country and in the
world in our polls that we conducted the psychological little tabulations that we
did asking several people questions two-thirds of people were moral
relativists. 66%. Think about that. Two out of three people believe there’s no such thing as
an objective difference between right and wrong and feel these are just constructs that exist
by human beings and we get to make up what’s right and what’s wrong. Two-thirds of people.
That’s where we’re at. That’s where we’re really at. Natural law versus man’s law or government.
Here’s the differences. Natural law is based upon the principles. It’s based upon principles and
truth meaning things that are inherent to creation are not made by humankind
natural law can only either be harmonized with due to knowledge and
understanding or rejected due to ignorance so it’s not it’s not something
that is based on compliance because of we fear the punishment that would result
of not understanding it okay if you don’t understand it and live according
to it the result is inescapable because men and women are not actually creating the result
okay the universe is bringing that result to us intelligently and dynamically all right in other
words once again this is about consequences you behave a certain way there’s certain consequences
you change the behavior you’ll change the consequential results natural law is universal
which means that it exists and applies anywhere in the universe regardless of physical location
There is no place you can go in the physical universe to escape natural law
Let me know if you find a way out of this universe and into another where natural law no longer applies
And uh, you know, we’ll take a look at it together
But until you figure out the way out of this universe and into a place that’s not governed by law
You’re bound by natural law. Okay
Natural law is eternal
It will exist for as long as the universe exists and it is immutable
exists and applies for as long as the universe exists and cannot be changed by anything humanity
is capable of doing or any other species in the universe is capable of doing for that matter.
Man’s law, on the other hand, let’s look at how this contrasts with natural law. It’s not based
on principles and truth. It’s based on dogmatic beliefs that are programs that are running in
the human mind. These are constructs of the mind that operate like programs. Man’s law is complied
with due to the fear of the punishment that will be conducted upon people who
attempt to not comply with it. It’s most of the only reason people ever comply
with the law of man and that’s a very low state of consciousness fear that
really is only going to get you all the negative things that we say we don’t
want if we’re in that vibration. Man’s law differs with location based upon the
whim of legislators like prohibition. Well I’m allowed to smoke marijuana in
one state and then I could be jailed for in another my freedom can be taken if I
across this imaginary line.
Hey, I’m a gun owner, okay?
If I take certain weapons that I own
across an imaginary line, I could be jailed for years.
But over this side of the imaginary line, it’s okay.
And you’re just exercising a right.
Over here, it’s morally wrong.
We’ll cage you for it.
Over here, yeah, you’re allowed to do that.
You can have that high capacity magazine.
But over here, you’re going into a cage for it
just by crossing an imaginary barrier
called a state border.
And people think that makes sense.
They think the moral relativism of man’s law makes sense.
They actually believe something can be moral in one place
and immoral in another place, you know?
That’s cognitive dissonance.
That’s holding two contradictory notions
in the mind simultaneously and accepting them both
when they’re clear contradictions with each other.
It’s called lying to yourself.
Let’s be honest about what it really is.
It’s called lying to yourself.
Man’s law changes with time
based upon the whim of legislators,
which is also moral relativism.
Prohibition in the 1920s.
Well, it was legal to possess and consume alcohol.
Then for years it became illegal to do so.
Then it switched back to becoming magically moral again.
We won’t cage you for doing it.
Well, it changes over time based on our preferences
and likes and dislikes.
Yeah, we get to make up what law is,
what right and wrong are.
It’s called moral relativism, all right?
And it’s one of the tenets of Satanism.
So what does this mean for the law of man, actually?
The people seem to have so much respect for.
Oh, we’re a nation of laws written by men.
We don’t give a damn about moral law.
We don’t really give a damn about what’s right and wrong.
But we have so much respect for the law of man,
which people actually believe is somehow based in morality,
when it’s nothing of the kind could be further from,
couldn’t get any further from the truth than that.
It’s based in moral relativism,
which is about the whims of the legislator
at any given time or place.
You listen to certain forms of music
in certain countries in the Middle East,
you could be jailed for years
just by putting a certain song on.
Imagine this.
And we would think that’s unacceptable and deplorable.
Yeah, we think you have this 30 round magazine here,
this state only allows 10 cartridges to go into a magazine.
I bring the physical object,
even if it’s not loaded with any ammunition
into another state, I can be put in a cage.
Physical piece of plastic, you know?
It’s just total nonsense.
Either something’s a right and you’re allowed to own it
and you need to be responsible for it,
or it’s not a right because you’re harming somebody.
You know, it doesn’t get any simpler than that.
So what’s this all mean for man’s law?
In light of natural law, what does it mean?
To understand natural law, what does that mean
for the laws of man here on Earth?
Well, what it actually means,
it’s simple if-then logic to apply.
If a particular man-made law is in harmony with natural law,
then it follows logically that it is redundant.
It is stating the obvious.
It is stating what is already known.
It’s like saying, I’m gonna write down,
yes, during the day, the sky refracts a blue frequency.
The sky is blue.
I’m gonna write that down and make it so.
Well, it’s redundant.
It’s self-evident.
You can go out in the sky and look at the natural color
of the sky on a clear day
and see what the frequency is with your own eyes.
No, you don’t need to have it written down, okay?
It’s a redundancy.
So if it’s in harmony already with natural law,
it’s stating a truth that is already there.
It’s an inherent truth.
It’s preexisting, it’s self-evident.
Therefore, the writing down of that concept
and calling it a law is irrelevant and unnecessary.
Now look, let’s look at the opposite.
What if something that man writes down as a law
is in direct opposition to natural law?
So if a particular man-made law is in opposition
to natural law, it follows logically
that it is both false, meaning that it is incorrect,
okay, that’s what natural law is,
it’s based in truth, that which is,
and it’s also immoral,
because if it’s not based in natural law,
it means that it is doing something
that is actually harming somebody
by taking something from them that doesn’t belong to you,
like taxation, like permits and licensing,
like suspending rights that do already exist,
et cetera, so forth, all right?
So therefore, it’s wrong,
and it cannot be legitimately binding upon anyone.
You can’t write down a wrong and say,
this is morally binding upon you,
even though it creates harm, it causes harm,
yet you must follow it, you know?
And people believe this.
We asked in the natural law seminar,
how many people believe that if a law is passed
and it restricts a right that you feel you have naturally
because that action that it’s saying you may not do
causes no one else any harm.
Do you have any moral obligation to obey that law
until you could find a way to get it changed?
And over two thirds of people said yes.
You have a moral obligation to obey that law
because these people have the moral right to issue commands
and write down laws that constrain you
even if that behavior actually doesn’t harm anybody
and therefore is a natural right.
You would still have to try to find a way
to get that law changed.
Nonsense, nonsense.
No one can be legitimately bound to a dictate of man
that prevents somebody from exercising a natural right.
It’s called mind control, is what it’s called.
So in light of the differences between man’s law
and natural law, in light of natural law,
man’s law is both irrelevant and unnecessary,
as it is either redundant,
because it is in harmony with natural law,
or it is completely immoral
because it is in direct opposition to natural law.
This is a system of slavery that is not needed.
There is equality under natural law, perfect equality.
Everyone has the exact same rights.
No one has any more or less rights than anyone else.
Also, since rights are not created by humanity,
and since they are the birthright of humanity,
gifted to us by the creator of the universe,
no human being or group of human beings
is actually capable in reality
of granting rights to anyone else,
nor is any human being capable
of revoking rights from anyone else.
Everybody has the same rights.
No one can make up a new right.
No one can grant a right to somebody
that is actually wrong.
Does not exist, never has existed, never will exist.
This is an illusory belief system, all right?
I’m not telling you people don’t believe that can be done.
I’m telling you in reality, in truth,
it can never be done.
Chris Leispooner phrased it pretty well.
He said, government is nothing but men acting in concert.
The morality and value of government
like any other association of men
will be no greater and no less than the morality
and value of the men comprising it.
Since government is nothing but men,
its inherent, quote, authority to act
is in no way greater or different
than the, quote, authority to act
of any individuals in isolation.
like that example of two people on the planet.
Government has no magic powers or, quote, authority
that is not possessed by private individuals.
Let he who asserts that government may do
that which the individual may not do
assume the onus of proof, that means the burden of proof,
and demonstrate his contention.
And you know what?
There’s nobody on this planet that can do that.
Because when it comes down to it,
if you’re telling somebody else
They may either commit a wrong against somebody else
or prevent someone else from exercising a right.
That’s a lie, and that does not exist, not in reality.
It exists in a diseased mind is where it exists.
Only in a sick mind is where that belief exists.
You have to be imbalanced in the mind, in the psyche,
to believe that that’s true.
It’s a mental illness.
I mean, that’s what it really is.
The word government, you break it down.
People say this word every day almost,
and yet they’ve never looked
at the etymological roots of the word.
It comes from the Latin verb gubernare.
Once again, no V in classical Latin, no V, okay?
So again, Vs were rendered as either Bs or Ps
in classical Latin language.
So you could write this in what would be more modern Latin
as gubernare with a V.
But in classical Latin or ancient Latin,
there is no V, so it would have been rendered
with a B, gubernare.
Now, what’s the election of a governor called?
It’s called a gubernatorial election, gubernatorial.
Gubernare is in there, okay?
Gubernare means to control.
The verb gubernare in Latin means to control.
The Latin noun mens, which is where the part,
the second part of the word ment is derived from,
means mind, okay?
So you put these together, and the word government
actually literally, from its etymological roots,
means to control the mind, or in other words, mind control.
Now, I’m gonna put something else up here for a moment.
The etymological origin of the English suffix ment, M-E-N-T,
is often debated in this etymological breakdown, all right?
And I’ve gotten stuff about this constantly,
and I’ve told people I’m not interesting
hearing about it anymore. I know where this comes from. I know why the creators of the English
language made it so, made it like this. It is overwhelmingly clear by people who have studied
linguistics and the origins of words in English from ancient languages that the creators of the
English language, deliberately chose the Latin noun mens, meaning mind, to represent or mean
in English the state of or the condition of. And this was done in direct keeping with the first
principle of natural law, as we’ve already discussed, the principle of mentalism,
which demonstrates that in order for any particular thing, event, or circumstance,
any state or condition to exist in manifested reality it as it currently
does that which is known as the plane of effects it must have first existed in
the plane of causality or the mental realm the mind okay we’ve already looked
at that principle of natural law so anything that ends in meant the original
etymological derivation means that it was made that way first by a state of
mind which led to its creation in physical reality okay any word you can
think of that ends in me NT meaning the state of or the condition of means it
happened in mind first and therefore it led to the state of or the condition of
in physical reality okay so when I say that government means mind control it
literally does and that is an accurate etymological breakdown okay the word
men’s was deliberately chosen for specific reasons and I just explained
the reason of that meaning the state of or the condition of and people many
people want to hotly contest that I’m telling you outright they’re wrong they
don’t understand why that was chosen men’s meaning mine was chosen
deliberately to mean the state of or the condition of government is based on this
illusory and false concept called authority people think certain people
are authorities that they actually have rights that other people don’t have the
right to command compel coerce and tell people this is right this is what you’re
gonna do and if you disagree I have the power to actually compel coerce or
constrain you against your will if you’re not harming anybody even in the
taking of that action. Authority is based upon an equal illusion that is called jurisdiction.
Now, if we break down this word, it comes from the Latin noun. Jurisdiction comes from Latin,
ius iuris. Ius iuris in Latin means law. Iuris is the possessive case. And the Latin verb dictere,
so ius dictere, iuris dictere, jurisdiction. Dictere means to say or to speak. Thus,
jurisdiction literally means to say what the law is or in other words we get to make up what the
law is the law is not something that exists in nature and is based upon right and wrong and
truth and morality no we get to make it up we’re god we get to say what’s right and what’s wrong
and therefore since we make the law we’re the owners of these people we’re they’re they’re in
our jurisdiction you know we own them and we get to make up what they’re allowed to do and what
they’re not allowed to do authority ultimately is an illusion again of a
diseased mind a diseased psyche based entirely in violence and built upon the
erroneous and dogmatic belief that some people are masters who have the moral
right to issue commands and others are slaves who have a moral obligation to
obey the commands of the Masters I don’t care what you want to call it you can
euphemize it any way you want I call it what it really is slavery that’s what it
really is. It doesn’t come down to anything else. You can call it whatever you want, euphemize it,
try to make it sound as nice or as pleasant as possible. It’s all one thing. It’s called slavery.
It’s always immoral and it needs to be ended. That’s it. And we have to develop the knowledge
and the courage to end it. The knowledge, the care, and the courage to end it. The belief in
the legitimacy of, quote, authority, this illusory nonsense notion, is the belief in the legitimacy
of slavery. Anybody who believes in that authority is legitimate and government is legitimate,
whether they want to admit it or not or know it or not or understand it or not, I don’t care what
they believe. They are advocating the legitimacy of slavery. That’s not my belief. I don’t care
who calls that my belief. I’m just looking right into the camera and saying this because I know
the people in this room know that that’s not my belief. I’m telling anybody who’s listening to
this that’s not my belief that’s eternal truth eternal truth okay you believe in these concepts
you are a supporter of slavery the end that’s how it really is not because i said so because that’s
how it really is okay and that’s called mind control for somebody to believe that slavery
is legitimate you gotta be under deep mind control you gotta be either that or a sick
psychopathic, absolute piece of garbage, okay? One of those things or another is true if you
believe in those concepts. And again, I’m not afraid to tell it to somebody right to their
face like that. I don’t care. I’m not here to serve truth, make friends, or be liked. I’m here
to tell people what the truth, I’m sorry, I’m not here to serve human beings, make friends, or be
liked. I am here to serve the truth. Whether it will be accepted is not up to me. I’m doing what
i’m charged to do by creation okay whether it’s accepted is somebody else’s karma not mine
ultimately authority is the idea that man can become god and through quote jurisdiction
dictate the law what the dark occultists of this world who are behind ostensible governments in
the world you know they set up all these institutions as temples right what this sick
psychopathic priest class ultimately believes is they’re going to become god we’re going to turn
natural law on top of its head, and we’re going to rule in hell. That’s it. We’re going to rule
in hell. It’s a religion. This is a religion. Governments are religion. The concept of
authority is a religion. Most people don’t see it that way. And I mean religion in the term of
false religion, okay? It comes from the Latin religare. I laugh when I hear people say it comes
from relegare, which means to read over again, to go back over something that you’ve already
read and read it again. It’s the most ridiculous, nonsensical derivation I’ve ever heard for the
word religion, to reread. I mean, please, let’s put this to bed, folks. Religion does not mean
to reread. It doesn’t come from relegare or relegare. I can’t remember which infinitive is
used for that verb offhand, but it comes from relegare, hence religion, R-E-L-I-G-A-R-E,
all right? Religare means to tie back, to hold back, or to thwart from forward progress by
tying or binding. Tying up so that you can’t move forward. That’s what relegare
is and that is the etymological root of religion. Because a false religion is a
system of control that is based in unchallenged dogmatic belief which keeps
the mind in a prison in order to hold back the progress of consciousness. And
that’s where the bulk of humanity is at. In a brain cage. They’re in the mind cage.
okay there is a positive connotation of religion it also means to reunite with
and what we need to reunite ourselves with is the truth and common sense and
natural law and a knowledge that there’s no such thing as the legitimacy as
legitimacy to slavery that’s what we need to reunite with you know and then
we’d be living with true religion we’d be practicing true religion instead of
fake religion. We’ve got to stop trying to make our religion truth, and we’ve got to start making
truth our religion. That’s what needs to be done. So what’s the one true divide that exists in
humanity? People say, oh, this is separation talk. We’re all one. No, we’re not. There is one true
divide that does exist in reality, and here’s what it is. The one true divide that separates
humanity into two distinct types of individuals. The criteria for this divide is whether or not
an individual believes in, quote, authority and therefore believes that there is legitimacy to
slavery. The two groups of people are the people who know slavery is never legitimate and people
who believe that it can be legitimate. That’s what actually separates humanity. See, all the
other things? Divide and conquer. Race, religion, sexuality, income, religious belief systems. These
are all divide and conquer techniques. There’s one real difference whether somebody believes in
slavery or not. And of course, people have called these, the difference, statists and anarchists,
right? So here’s a couple of memes that I picked up on Facebook. Statism is the brilliant idea that
we give a small group of people the right to kidnap, imprison, harass, steal from, and kill
people so that we can be protected from people who kidnap, harass, steal from, and kill people.
Yeah, that makes a whole lot of sense if you ask me. I think it’s going to work out brilliantly
with that system in place, okay? An anarchist, I couldn’t find any good pictures of anarchists
because they’re all fake anarchists who want to destroy property and think that they’re somehow
doing the world some good, you know? The black bloc. They’re really communists in disguise,
okay when you really boil down to it they don’t know what anarchy is at all
they’re just some you know Marxists who thinks that that’s some that ideology
that junk ideology is some kind of a pathway to freedom you know it’s a bunch
of left-brain clowns have no understanding of natural law you know now
go put your polka dot jumpsuit and some floppy shoes on and go get yourself a
nice clown nose seriously because that’s what those people are they’re a joke
they’re a joke they don’t know the first thing about what freedom is not the
first thing okay so I was looking for good pictures of anarchist so I was
gonna put like you know maybe myself Larkin Rose Freeman you know Frater X
people who get all the stuff who I personally like their work Michael
Tessarion etc David Icke but I said hey look let’s put a meme up there that
really expresses it so I found this picture of Jesus a meme that says I’m an
anarchists, but most of my followers are statists, you know? People who are these fake-ass Christians
who believe they somehow are following the teachings of Christ, and they believe in
government, they believe in financial institutions, they believe in organized religion. These are the
three things that killed Christ, if you even accept the historicity of the event. Who was
Christ waging basic conflict with? The Pharisees and Sadducees, the organized religious order and
controlling religious orders of his day, okay? What really got him into deep trouble, he was
pissing them off, but they were already on the wane. The old world order was on the way out and
the new world order was already on the way in at that time, you know? He got himself in real trouble
when he went against the financial institutions, the money changers at the temple, taking people
for a ride for temple coins right and he flogged their ass he took out the switch on them right
not somebody who never got angry who accepted evil and said oh it’s just a it’s just an experience
you know none of it matters took out the switch and beat their ass for usury okay um and then who
finally put him to death the police of their day the roman empire you know roman centurions
the operating standing army and police of their day the government so who is he who is he waging
spiritual warfare against to try to bring righteousness into the world and again i don’t
care whether you accept it as historical fact or spiritual allegory you could care less believe
what you want doesn’t matter all that matters is the teaching he was waging water war spiritual
war against the three entrenched mind control religious establishment establishments of his day
organized religion organized finance and government and people don’t see it that
way so-called Christians you know because they’re not interested in the
real teachings they just want to call themselves something and identify it and
say all that that magically makes me this you know because you go to church
on Sunday doesn’t make you a Christian you know no more than going to a
synagogue synagogue would make you align with the true teachings of the Torah no
more than you know attending a mosque would align you with the true teachings
of Islam or any other religion to take the core essence of the teachings of morality
from those systems.
They’re all people who claim these faiths in name only when they don’t understand real
freedom.
So a statist is an individual who erroneously believes there’s such a thing as authority
that is vested in certain human beings, magically giving them the right to rule over other people.
This authority means that certain people who we call government have the, quote, moral
right to issue commands to those whom they rule, those under their jurisdiction, and that their
subjects or slaves have a, quote, moral obligation to obey the arbitrary dictates or laws, quote
unquote, that are set by their masters. Most simply put, a statist is nothing more than someone who
believes in the legitimacy of slavery. Conversely, an anarchist, a true anarchist anyway, is one who
knows that there could never be legitimacy to authority or government
because those terms are simply euphemisms for violence and slavery and
coercion which are always immoral and in opposition to natural law let’s look at
what the word anarchy really means again you got to break it down from the Greek
prefix an which means without or the absence of and the Greek noun archon
they’re written in Greek script which means master or ruler and again I mean
externally one who externally rules another or claims to be the master of
another that’s what the term archon means in its connotation anarchy as we
can see by putting these together does not mean without rules the word archon
does not mean rules okay because there’s always going to be rules in effect
called natural law, the laws of morality. It means rulers, imposed rulers. That’s what archon
means in Greek. It literally means anarchy now, putting it together. An, absence of, archon,
master or ruler. The absence of masters or rulers, externally imposed masters or rulers.
meaning when we put it together okay it means without rulers without masters now if you give
people that term no masters no rulers no masters no slaves what word are they going to associate
those phrases with freedom but if you tell people what does anarchy mean to you what do you
associate it with what are they going to tell you chaos which is the exact opposite that’s in that
other column, okay? They have deliberately obfuscated the meaning of the word through
a mind control technique called endless repetition. If I could keep telling you a word doesn’t mean
what it means, that’s not a projector, that’s a hammer. Hey, could you check out my hammer over
there and make sure it’s projecting the image on the board correctly? You know, the bulb burned
out in my hammer. I might need to go buy a new hammer. If I kept doing that endlessly, endlessly,
endlessly for years and years and years, people would start calling that device a hammer. If I
I got enough people to keep calling it that.
So they’ve gotten enough people to call freedom chaos.
Think about that.
They’ve gotten enough people to believe
that the absence of the state of slavery
means chaos instead of freedom.
It’s almost unfathomable.
It’s almost incomprehensible,
the mind job that’s been done on this species.
It’s almost incomprehensible.
Anarchy is the state of existence
where there are no masters and no slaves.
Therefore, what it really means is the absence of slavery,
or in other words, true freedom.
That’s all it means.
I prefer to call it anarkani, okay?
Keeping the entire word arkan
instead of taking out the O-N, okay?
If we keep that there and call it anarkani,
and I say I’m an anarkanist,
people will ask, well, what the hell is that?
And then you could really break the word down
and say the absence of archans,
the absence of those who would claim to be masters over a population of slaves that’s what an
anarchonist is it’s saying that’s illegitimate that’s unnecessary and that we need to do away
with that state of existence okay so we look at these two this true divide again the statist and
the anarchist i call the statist the archonist this is somebody who believes in the legitimacy
of the archons, the rulers, okay?
And I’ll be talking about in future presentation
the concept of the archons more in future presentations.
And the anarchist, as it’s been called,
I think should be called the anarchonist
because that’s somebody who knows
that there’s no legitimacy to the mastery over other people
or the rulership externally over others,
keeping them as slaves or subjects.
There’s no legitimacy to that, and that’s the one true divide that separates all consciousness
here on the earth. The real divide and the real enlightenment comes, do you understand there’s
no legitimacy to slavery, or do you continue to believe that there’s legitimacy to slavery? That’s
the divide in consciousness that has to be bridged. The fear of chaos, this is what keeps this system
going. Chaos can’t be viewed as something to fear. It’s got to be viewed as a teacher, a harsh teacher,
but a teacher nonetheless. See, chaos teaches us through the apophatic process what not to do,
okay? That’s a bad idea, okay? You probably shouldn’t do that if your desire is not to burn
your hand to the point where it’s blistering and flesh is starting to peel off of it. If you don’t
care about whether that happens, by all means, keep it right on that stove, okay? Right on that
electric stove. But see, if you say, I don’t want to be burned, there are requirements for obtaining
that condition. It means you can’t keep your hand on something that is extraordinarily hot or natural
law will take over and burn your flesh. Doesn’t require your belief. That’s how it works. Well,
this is humanity humanity is the little child that is a little slow and they
want not to be burned yet simultaneously they insist no I want to put my hand on
the burner while the range is on and not be burned simultaneously well good luck
with that folks cuz it doesn’t work that way you don’t want to be burned the hand
can’t be kept there while the stove is on the end you don’t want negative self-inflicted suffering
and chaos in your life you got to align your behavior to natural law which means you got to
know the difference objectively between right and wrong and willfully through your free will
choose deliberately choose the right action over the wrong action then you won’t be burned but as
long as you don’t want as long as you have your hand on that stove which means you’re in opposition
to natural law, enjoy the burn. Enjoy it, right? Get used to it till the flesh melts off the bone
and then the bones turn into dust because that’s what you’re going to get. That’s how it works.
And again, nobody wants to hear that. They don’t want to hear that the natural laws don’t care
about you. They work flawlessly all the time and bring you the result that you’re creating.
The control and slavery system is actually about the limitation of free will through the destruction
of possibility. See, all they’ve done, right? The old world order used to be religion and priest
kings, right? We’re in between you and God. We’re the intercessors, the intermediaries. We make the
law. You’re our subjects. You’re our slaves. You obey or it’s our wrath. All they’ve done is take
the concept of a singular ruler, which was the old world order, and they’ve converted it into
the concept of now there’s a ruling class called government that gets to make up what we tell you
you may or may not do okay and they’re up here at the top of the pyramid now that’s all they turned
it from a monarchy to somewhat of an oligarchy but it’s the same concept we’re the moral masters
that you have a moral obligation to obey and you’re the slave class you know that that has
an obligation to obey our commands. That’s it. Nothing changed. All they did is say, well,
no, people don’t no longer believe in the priest king. So we need to create an institution where
this quote unquote authority is seemingly diffused through many people. It’s always been nonsense.
It’s always been mind control. It’s not going to be anything else other than that until it goes
away. True freedom includes infinite possibility because infinite possibility by definition
includes the possibility for chaos.
For real freedom to exist, we have to accept,
hey, things might not go right all the time.
We live in a physical domain, a physical world.
Hey, there could be dangers, you know?
Nothing could ever be sanitized or made completely safe
as far as physical world activities are concerned.
There’s always going to be the possibility
something could happen, go wrong,
somebody could get hurt, chaos could happen, okay?
If you live in that state of fear
that that’s going to happen. What is that? Is that high consciousness or low consciousness?
It’s low consciousness. Low consciousness can only create what? Chaos. The fear of chaos itself
can only get you more chaos because it’s based in fear. Just keep referring to that expression
chart. Go online. I have slides of it online. It’s in videos I’ve done. Print it. Read it. Look at it.
print it and stick it up in your home. Understand how that chart works. Those expressions that I
went over, those 10 expressions. The possibility of chaos from manifesting, the possibility that
it may manifest has to be embraced without fear if we’re going to be truly free. It must be
embraced. You have to say, I am going to allow for the possibility that chaos may occur because
that’s getting out of the consciousness of fear, which that’s what will lead to freedom.
Removing that fear. The fear of the possibility of chaos is actually equated to the fear of true
freedom. When somebody says, I can’t ever believe that a system with no masters could work out. I
can’t even envision how it could work out. What’s that called? What’s been deadened in that person?
what have they lost imagination there it is that is actually the equivalent of
the death of the imagination now what is the imagination the imagination is the
powerful ability of the human mind to envision a different state or condition
than the one which is already manifested in the present so imagination must first
be present in the mind in order to create a different state of existence
than the one currently being experienced and this is because according to the
principle of mentalism for any different state to manifest in the physical world
the plane of effects it must first exist within the mind or the plane of
causality if the imagination is stifled or destroyed and the destruction of the
imagination is what I refer to as total mind control you can’t go into any more
total mind-controlled state as the imagination being dead. If that happens, any positive change
to our state of existence becomes completely impossible. And this is where many people are
already at. The fear of the possibility of chaos is more than even the fear of true freedom. It is
the death of the imagination. It is putting the mind permanently in the cage. You can’t let that
force within us called the imagination die because that’s the only way to envision a way out of the
prison. You have to envision it first, then you have to put those thoughts and emotions that you
use for that envisioning process into actual action so that it becomes manifested in the
physical world. Through their fear of the possibility of chaos, which is actually the
fear of true freedom, most people advocate the legitimacy and continuance of authority in
government and are therefore actually advocating the legitimacy and continuance of violence and
slavery. Those who believe that authority is necessary and that it must continue because of
this fear of chaos have actually been duped into believing that human slavery is necessary. And
get this, folks, human slavery must therefore continue in order to prevent chaos. Now imagine
that. Imagine that. That’s what statism is though. That’s what the religion called the belief in
government or statism is. It is the belief that human slavery is necessary and must continue
indefinitely in order to prevent chaos from manifesting. Now tell me how that could possibly
work. Can violence and slavery, which is actually what government is a euphemism for, statism and
government are just euphemisms for violence and slavery. Can violence and slavery ever possibly
prevent chaos? Why? Why can’t it? Because they are chaos. Violence and slavery are chaos. We are
already in the state of chaos. Being held under the threat of violence and duress, which is slavery,
is the state of chaos.
So forget about fearing chaos coming on.
You’re in it now.
Surprise, surprise.
Hate to break the news to you all, okay?
We’re already in the state of chaos.
We need to create real order
by getting rid of violence and slavery.
Order followers, these are the people
who keep this system of slavery in place, okay?
They’re the people who keep this system of slavery in place.
Let me just say this again.
order followers are the people who keep the existence of slavery in place. Not the ruling
class, not the masters, not the so-called elite, which aren’t the elite of anything but the bottom
of a trash can, okay? The people who keep slavery in place are the people who willfully follow their
orders. Nobody wants to hear that. And people will hate you for saying it. Following orders means,
by definition, doing what you are told to do without judging for yourself whether or not
that action that you are being ordered to carry out is actually right or wrong. That’s the
definition of following orders. I mean, can anybody refute that? Is that not the actual definition of
following someone else’s order by definition you’re not if you’re following the order you’re
given the order and then you just act you just do it because you’re following the order you don’t
sit there and go what that person told me to do right do i have a right to do that is that moral
should i do that because you know it it’s okay and it doesn’t hurt somebody else or should i not do
that because it actually does cause harm it’s not what an order follower does in their mind
An order follower says, yes, sir, and follows the order.
That’s why it’s called an order follower.
That’s why it’s called following an order.
So that’s the definition of what an order follower is.
It’s not my perception of what an order follower is.
It’s the actual definition of order following, okay?
If an individual, this is key to understand,
if an individual is performing the task
of following orders. By definition, that individual cannot be exercising conscience.
Since by definition, exercising conscience means that one is willfully choosing through their free
will for themselves, right action over wrong action. So the concept of following orders
is completely polar opposite to the concept of exercising conscience. You cannot be doing the
same things simultaneously. It’s impossible to do those two things simultaneously. They are
contradictions in terms by definition. Most people don’t grasp that. By definition, if you’re
following orders, you cannot be actually exercising conscience, which involves free will choice
based on the knowledge of right and wrong.
Here’s what order following gets us
as far as a nation is concerned.
You know, not that we’re not already there,
not that these people already didn’t take us
because we’re taken by them already covertly.
They took us through the school systems.
They couldn’t beat us militarily.
So they said, well, let’s send our ideologues over there
and get into the minds of their children.
And if you don’t believe that’s what happened,
you’re very, very, very naive.
Not only the Nazis, but the communists as well.
because really it’s all just forms of socialism that’s what feudalism is worldwide socialism is
there’s no such thing as private property state owns everything rights don’t exist property rights
don’t exist everybody’s a feudal serf again it’s called neo-feudalism i don’t care which branch
you come at it from you want to come at it from the left that’s called communism you want to come
at it from the right that’s called national socialism communism’s international socialism
they’re both the same force it’s called feudalism let’s just call it what it is it’s called
feudalism which is in itself just another euphemism for slavery they want neo-feudalism
which is the new world order of slavery okay and it’s already here it’s not something that’s coming
it’s here now the object is to get out of it this is the result of following orders that’s what
following orders gets a society following orders should never be seen as a virtue following orders
is evil. I don’t care whether you’re, I don’t care if somebody, I don’t care if somebody who
is considered a holy man gives me an order and I follow it. I’ve just committed an act of evil
as far as I’m concerned. If I’m acting based on solely what somebody else has told me to do,
that’s evil. There’s no morality in it at all, at all, at all. It’s not a virtue. It’s evil.
Okay. Let me just make that so abundantly clear and state it so unequivocally. There’s no such
thing as any possible moral following of orders. The two terms are contradictory, all right? I was
just following orders is never a valid excuse or justification for immoral criminal behavior,
and this lame attempt to abdicate personal responsibility should never be accepted as a
valid excuse for such behavior. And why it’s done is through justification. And again, that means
to create a right from yus meaning right or law and the latin verb facere which means to make or
to create and this is what they say i was just following orders i was just doing my job i was
shutting down your protest you don’t have a right to speak the politicians commanded me so so i just
came out i was just doing my job hitting you with a sound cannon you know just doing my job just
following my orders it’s a justification you’re a criminal there’s nothing moral in that there’s
nothing virtuous in that. It’s called criminal behavior, criminal activity. And what they do is
try to create it into a right, make it into a right by a justification. And nobody should ever
accept their justifications. Because you know what their justifications is? You know what they are?
It’s called a 100% crock of bull that is a complete lie. It’s a lie. They’re just straight
up looking you in the face and saying, I’m not responsible for that. I just did it, but I’m not
the one who’s responsible for it because i was acting on orders well see this defense didn’t
work as the nuremberg defense and nobody in america should be accepting it nobody in america
should be accepting it because they believe in the legitimacy of authority and government
through mind control that’s what they believe it they believe there’s legitimacy to it most people
actually believe that there’s legitimacy to this criminal behavior because a class of people
calling themselves government have magically been imbued and gifted with such rights,
quote unquote. They believe they have rights other people don’t. They themselves believe it,
but worse is that the people who are actually affected by that criminal behavior, they believe
they have the authority to do it. Gandhi said, you assist an evil system most effectively by
obeying its orders and decrees. An evil system never deserves such allegiance. Allegiance to it
means partaking of the evil. A good person will resist an evil system with his or her whole soul,
which means saying no. Moral culpability. What does this mean? The determination of who is
ultimately at fault or deserving of blame. Again, this is a legitimate and real concept. There is
fault. There is blame. We got to get over this new age nonsense that nobody’s at fault. Nobody’s to
blame. You should never say, hey, you shouldn’t have done that. That caused a lot of chaos and
trauma for other people. You’re not to blame. It just happened. No, wrong. The people who did the
behavior are to blame. Who carried out the Holocaust in Germany? The people who followed
their orders to do it. That’s who carried it out. Order followers is the answer. Who carried out the
purge of political dissonance in Soviet Russia? Order followers. And they’re always in the form
of police. Why do you think they call a totalitarian system a police state? Why don’t
they call it a banker state? How come they don’t call it a politician state? What about a lawyer
state? How about a judge state? Why not call it any of those things? You want to know why? Because
none of those people are ultimately responsible for bringing that condition into manifestation
through their behavior. They’re the order givers. The order followers carry out their commands,
and through their behavior, make that condition a reality. That’s why it’s called a police state,
because every police state that has ever existed has always been created by police who follow their
orders because they don’t want to take responsibility and think for themselves and
know the difference between right and wrong for themselves like an adult instead i want to be a
child who obeys daddy because i have daddy issues all right and that’s what it’s really about folks
we’re going to get to that there is such a thing as blame for the commission of actions which have
resulted in harm or loss to others this is what culpable means it comes from the latin culpa
meaning fault or blame it means at fault or deserving of blame now who’s more morally
culpable the order giver or the order follower and please recognize i’ve underlined and capitalized
the term more. I’m not telling you the order givers are not morally culpable. They are.
That’s not the question. Are any of these people morally culpable is not my question.
My question is, look at the full question. Who is more morally culpable? The order giver
or the order follower? Always, always, at all times and places, at all times and places.
I put this meme up on Facebook, and I mean I got some hate back for it
Okay, people don’t want to hear this like I said
I’m not here to be popular to make friends here to tell people what the truth actually is and they have to accept it or
Reject it on their own. I put this meme
I made this meme and put it up on Facebook and it had politicians on the left and said my
Actions underlined and capitalized didn’t cause that and then there were some soldiers or Marines whatever
they are order followers on the right side. And they’re also saying the same statement.
My actions didn’t cause that. And then at the bottom, I just put this question. I’m sorry.
Looks like, oh, I’m sorry. At the top, I put this question. Who is lying and who is telling the
truth? So who’s lying here? And if people can’t see, I hope that they can see this horrific
picture. This is the result of bombings that took place in the Middle East around, I think,
around Iraq, and it’s a father carrying his dead child in his arms, okay? Maybe if bombs were
raining down on our children, we might think differently about going in and waging imperialism
on other nations. I don’t know. Maybe we might think differently about it, right? But when it
happens to somebody else’s child, that’s okay. That’s done in the name of freedom, okay? Well,
who caused this? Did they cause it? No, they didn’t cause it. They are not the actual cause of this,
because you know with all they did they signed some pieces of paper wearing their expensive suits
okay and they told these guys they said well you’re under our orders now go and bomb these
people and you know what these people did say yes sir and go and drop the bombs and and fire off the
ammunition okay these are the people whose actions create things like this not these people all
they’re doing is speaking into somebody else’s ear. All they’ve done is speech. Speech, not actions.
See, again, look at the, really look. My actions didn’t cause that. Yes, it is. If these people
are saying my actions didn’t cause that, they’re lying. Very, very, very painful and difficult
thing for people to comprehend and accept. I’m not telling you you shouldn’t feel bad hearing this,
But I’m telling you it’s true.
The painful truth, the order follower always bears more moral culpability than the order giver.
For the reason that the order follower is the one who actually performed the action
and in taking such action actually brought the resultant harm into physical manifestation.
Order following is the pathway to every form of evil and chaos in our world.
It should never be seen as a virtue by anyone who considers themselves a moral human being.
Order followers have ultimately been personally responsible and morally culpable
for every form of slavery and every single totalitarian regime
that has ever existed upon the face of the earth.
That’s the painful truth that people don’t want to accept
because they want to believe the absolute nonsense that order following is a virtue of any kind.
and it needs to be obliterated from the face of the earth
because it’s not the way to any kind of virtues or order.
It’s the pathway to evil and annihilation.
That’s what it is.
Responsibility versus abdication.
Why don’t these people want to think for themselves?
It’s too easy to just follow the orders of somebody else.
They believe somehow magically this absolves them
of personal responsibility to choose right from wrong.
An individual’s personal responsibility to choose right action over wrong action for themselves
always belongs to that individual, and that responsibility can never be given to another
person or passed along. One can only claim and imagine that they can abdicate their personal
responsibility for such choice to someone else. It can never actually be done in reality. You’re
only making a claim, I’m not responsible for that behavior because this person told me to do it.
That’s just a claim. And moreover, what it really is is it’s just a damn lie, okay? More simply put,
an individual is always personally responsible for their own actions, period, and the end.
If you did it, you’re responsible for it. There are no cop-outs. Stop trying to make excuses or
justifications for criminal behavior. Own up to personal responsibility. If you did wrong action,
you did it. You caused it. I like how David Icke words this. He says, accept responsibility for
yourself and your actions, thoughts, and words. You alone make these choices, so you alone are
answerable to the consequences of your behavior. The feeble excuse that your boss required it,
that the establishment expected it, holds no truth or justification. What is the point of
Having principles if you allow others
to dictate your behavior.
Really, those who allow others to dictate their behavior
don’t have principles, and there’s a reason
they don’t have principles, because they hate themselves.
They’re in psychological self-loathing,
and there’s a reason they’re in that state,
which my future work is gonna cover in depth,
in extensive depth and detail.
At the end of the day, you will judge your performance
and the contribution you’ve made to creation.
It will not be based on what another expected of you
or what you did because you felt trapped.
Like, oh, there’s no other way.
I can’t envision my way out of this.
I can’t envision doing something else.
I might have to get another job.
I might have to read and learn.
I can’t envision becoming a different person
than the identity I’ve already forged for myself.
How could I possibly imagine that?
I have all my eggs in this basket.
My whole ego identity is all wrapped up
in my job and what I do.
That defines who I am.
You know, I can’t go against that.
It’s all nonsense.
It’s all what people are doing
just because they feel trapped
they can’t imagine that there’s another way. Most people erroneously believe this is the second part
of the abdication of responsibility on the part of the people. Most people erroneously believe that
they can hand over their natural law right to defend themselves to another individual group
or entity. In making such a false claim that somebody else is my protector, somebody else,
it’s their responsibility to protect me, okay, and defend me, they have attempted to abdicate
a personal responsibility which actually always belongs to them and can never be given away.
That’s the self-defense principle. You own it. It’s yours. You can’t give it away to somebody
else. Shock and amazement, okay? That is your responsibility already. And guess what? You know
what? They’re all too happy. These controllers are now even all too happy to say, it’s not our
responsibility to protect you. Because what their actual goal is, is they’re just revenue men for
the new king. That’s all they are. And to slap people back in the line if they try to exercise
rights that the new king called government has decreed that they may not exercise. That’s what
their real role is. They don’t serve and protect the people. They serve and protect the ruling
class. And they don’t want to admit that to themselves. You know why? Because they’re liars,
most of all to themselves. It’s a bunch of childish liars. Franklin said those who would
give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither and will lose
both. And this addresses the fear of chaos and the desire to abdicate your personal responsibility
to defend yourself to other people just because you’re afraid and you don’t want to take the
responsibility of doing it yourself. You want to stay in that mindset, I’ll give up my freedom to
be safe? Well, enjoy your safe slavery. I, for one, will take my dangerous and chaotic freedom,
okay i’ll take the i’ll take the the absolute cannibal lurking around every corner and i’ll
take my chances thank you very much give me my freedom and my assault rifle and i’ll take my
chances thank you okay so the idea that you just want to be kept slave safe and you’ll give up your
freedom to do so it’s just a child that’s how a child thinks and that’s what this is really about
not wanting to grow up and become adults.
And again, there’s a reason for this.
This is the underlying psychological reason,
but there’s an even deeper one.
But I’m gonna touch on this one first.
Self-respect versus self-loathing.
People who don’t wanna take personal responsibility
and become an adult are in this psychological condition.
It’s called self-loathing.
What it means is you hate yourself.
Nobody who wants to perpetuate slavery
can possibly like themselves.
They cannot love themselves.
It’s impossible.
you are already in a state of self-hatred if you believe in government
if you believe in its legitimacy okay because you believe in slavery and
therefore you’re in that slavery system and you want it to continue how can you
possibly love yourself it’s not possible self-loathing is the underlying
psychological condition that causes people to attempt to abdicate their own
personal responsibility to exercise conscience and fall into patterns of
order following and justification just that is it as it is not possible for an
order follower to truly be exercising conscience, it is not possible for an order follower to truly
love themselves. These two states cannot exist simultaneously. You cannot be an order follower
and love yourself. It is impossible. They are contradictory psychological conditions, okay?
Here’s what an order, a self-loathing person really is. They’re trapped in a trauma abuse
victim cycle a trauma happens there’s an abuser there’s a victim and then it
repeats itself because often the one who’s abused becomes the traumatizer and
then the cycle repeats again talked about this pretty extensively on my
podcast series all right that’s what self-loathing that’s what this mind
state okay this is a golem creature okay it’s a 100% programmed and lifeless
thing that is imbued with the ability to actually move like a robot. You can liken it to a flesh
robot. And it’s a concept in ancient dark occultism. And the golem is driven by the force
of self-loathing. And that’s what the order followers are. They’re golems. I’m not saying
this to insult people. I don’t really care how people take it. I’m telling them what they really
are and what the dark occultists think of them. They call them their dogs and their pets. That’s
their name for the police and the military. I did a whole series on that, okay? And I’m not telling
you that from book knowledge. I’m telling you that from their lips to my ears. That’s what they call
them. The golem is in this mindset. Since I have suffered, I will cause suffering to others. Since
I can’t deal with my nested psychological traumas and childhood issues and inadequacy issues,
okay, I’m going to take out all of that nested subconscious psychological frustration on other
people that I have no right to take it out upon. That’s the golem mindset. Self-loathing is created
when an earlier trauma has been suppressed and buried deeply into the subconscious. That’s the
role of the subconscious, to protect the conscious mind from traumatic experiences so that the
conscious mind doesn’t keep reliving it and therefore re-experiencing it in the physiology.
However, if we never bring up that shadow material to the conscious level, it builds
and builds and builds until it ultimately destroys us, psychically and spiritually.
Instead of confronting, dealing with, and healing that trauma, people don’t want to
do that work.
It’s too hard to dredge up that shadow material.
It’s hard work.
Believe me, to come out of the mind state I was in, I had to do that shadow work for
years, years of more suffering and pain, saying, what do I have to look in the mirror and
confront about myself and then work to change
and admit thousands and thousands and thousands
and thousands of times, I was wrong.
I was wrong.
I was wrong.
I don’t know how many thousands of times
I had to look in a mirror and say that to myself.
Sometimes to a point where I was so depressed
I couldn’t get out of bed for days.
I would just lay in bed and play doom metal all day.
Literally, endlessly, repetitively.
And just sitting there in that condition
of total self-loathing and total depression
because of what I know I took part in
and that I know was still my mental makeup,
was still my psychological makeup
that was gonna take years to get out of.
And I’m trying to explain this to prevent people
from having to go through all that suffering.
This knowledge can be gleaned
without having to go down that path.
It can be done.
I’m not telling you that’s easy work, but it is possible.
Such trauma could take the form of feelings of inadequacy,
whether they are real or imagined.
And you know what that mind state ultimately is?
It’s self-prison.
That’s somebody putting themself in a cage.
These people who want to take out
their psychological frustrations on other people,
they’re prisoners.
They are in the cage and they love being in the cage.
They don’t have any desire for freedom.
The only kind of person that would have no desire
for real freedom is a person who’s in the psychological
state of self-loathing and hates themself
and does not love themself.
Now, what heals self-loathing?
Self-respect.
And we have to know what the word respect means.
And this is about looking at yourself, introspection.
Respect comes from the Latin re, meaning again,
and the Latin verb spectare, which means to look at.
You put them together, to look at again,
to take another look at.
Well, what are you taking another look at?
You’re taking another look at yourself.
That’s what respect starts as.
You can’t give something to somebody that you don’t have.
If I don’t have $10 in my pocket, can’t give it to you.
If I don’t have a coin in my pocket,
I can’t give it to somebody else.
You gotta have it first to give it.
So nobody can give respect to anybody else
unless they first develop it inwardly.
Self-respect has to come first.
And that’s why these people don’t respect anybody,
order followers, most of all themselves.
Until they do that work of self-introspection,
they’re not gonna develop that self-respect.
And I’m not, again, I’m not telling you that’s easy work.
It’s hard work that can take a lot of time.
And it’s dredging up shadow material
that most people want to run away from.
They don’t want to confront that about themselves.
Only self-respect can heal self-loathing
and therefore help to put an order follower
on the path to conscience.
We need to take another look at ourselves.
The lost word, all right,
this is the end of the natural law segment
and I’m just going to talk about solutions
toward the end a little bit, all right?
the lost word. It’s a concept in esoteric Freemasonry, which represents a state of
consciousness that has been largely, quote-unquote, lost to the majority of human beings.
In order to speak the, quote-unquote, lost word, a human being must work upon themselves
in order to achieve a state of equilibrium or balance between the left and right hemispheres
of the brain. In such a state of balanced consciousness the being has come to know
oneself as well as the working operations of the macrocosm meaning natural law. In doing so
that person has also come to understand the objective difference between right and wrong
or as these concepts are referred to in the tradition of Freemasonry they have come to
understand the difference between light which is right and darkness which is wrong or light which
is knowledge of right and wrong and darkness which is ignorance of right and wrong respectively
all right what is the lost word though that’s the lost word ladies and gentlemen you know the
knowledge of the highest levels of freemasonry now most actual freemasons in the lodge system
don’t know the lost word. The lost word is no. And I would suggest to you, it is a dual word.
The lost word is dual, meaning it’s two things. It’s not just one. It is the word no, N-O,
and it is the word no, K-N-O-W. Those are the lost words, okay? In the enlightened state of
consciousness generated through the knowledge of natural law, a human being is finally able to
speak the so-called lost word, which is no. No is the word of all power. Only when we say no to
those who would claim to be our owners, those who would claim that it is they who will decide which
rights we have or do not have, do we stop externalizing our power to anyone outside of
ourselves, and in doing so, reclaim all of our rights, all of our property that has been taken
without right. Sadly, very, very few people in our world have the knowledge, care, and courage
that is required to do this. This is why this all-powerful word is considered lost.
and there’s the other variant of the lost word no know your rights the reason you have to know
what the difference between right and wrong is and therefore know what rights you have and what
rights you do not have is because those who do not know those things will never say the lost word
to someone who claims to be their owner they will not say no and oh so let’s look at some solutions
I call this section Teaching Natural Law to Others.
Because as we’re talking about, education is the only solution.
Knowledge is the solution.
The propagation of that knowledge is education, which means to lead out from.
Educere in Latin means to lead one out from something.
And what is education?
It means to lead one out of darkness, out of ignorance.
That’s what a real teacher does.
It doesn’t push somebody out.
it says I’m gonna go first and show you the way and you could follow you know if
you feel that this is the accurate path okay but you could do the same discovery
process it’s a repeatable process that’s what a science is which I’ve said this
is not a belief system or religion it is a science this is also known teaching
natural law to others which is what I am doing is has been called in all of the
positive occult traditions the great work and it’s I call it the true great
work because the darker cultists take everything and twist it around and they
have their own variant of the quote great work which is creating a world of
total slavery that’s all that’s the dark great work I call this the true great
work or the light great work however you want to refer to it as it’s just a piece
of jargon it’s just a tag we put on it shift happens well maybe but maybe not
the results not guaranteed here folks the New Agers want to tell you it’s all
guaranteed it’s all in hand you know the the the zeta reticulians are going to be
coming in from orbit any moment here give us all the secrets to the universe
save us from our own ignorance you know you just got to wait a few more years or
decades or millennia but they’ll be here soon a quantum shift in human
consciousness is required for humanity to become free of its self-imposed state
of slavery. Unfortunately, this great change is not an automatic process, nor is it guaranteed
to happen at all. We can be in this condition for a very, very, very, very long time, or it can
snowball and lead to total annihilation and the extinction of the human species. The positive
outcome is not guaranteed. Anybody who thinks it is is very naive and extraordinarily right-brained
and overly positive. I’m not telling you the negative outcome is guaranteed either. I’m telling
you can go either way depending on how consciousness goes about how many people in quantum numbers are
going to choose truth over deception that’s what’s going to guarantee the that’s what’s going to
determine the outcome whether or not it will occur is a function of the human will to learn the truth
and to teach it to others this involves enormous effort enormous dedication and most of all
enormous persistence. You can’t give up. Continuous application of will is required.
Continuous work. In alchemy, there’s a saying. It’s like the catchphrase for the alchemical
tradition. Labore et Constantia. It means work and constancy, continual efforts. That’s what’s
going to get this boulder up the mountain. That’s it. And it’s going to go kicking and screaming,
folks, because of the level of calcification the human mind is at. I don’t expect this to be an
easy process. I’m not blowing smoke up your rear end and telling you, hey, come over and do the
great work. It’s going to be so much fun. It’s going to be so easy. We’re going to get it done
real quick and everything’s going to be fine. If I was some new age guru who was trying to get you
all to believe what I’m saying, that’s what I would tell you. Because all I’d be worried about
is how popular I am and how many followers I can accrue. I’m not interested in that. I’m interested
and telling you how it really is.
That doesn’t make me popular.
As a matter of fact,
that makes me hated by a lot of people, okay?
This is not going to be easy.
A quantum shift has requirements.
Quantum, the word quantum is derived
from the Latin noun quantum.
It’s the same word in Latin as it is in English.
Quantum in Latin means an amount of something.
In order to tip the scales of truth and justice
back to balance,
a certain amount of people
actually need to be doing the great work
to help others to receive truth.
If we don’t have enough people doing that,
those scales are not going to tip in the opposite direction.
Got news for you.
We need to hit a critical mass number.
Numbers are required.
The New Age movement wants to tell you
no numbers aren’t required.
A tiny, tiny, tiny, tiny portion
can make great, great, great change happen.
Nonsense.
It’s not called a quantum shift for no reason.
it’s called a quantum shift because quantum means an amount okay you need to
put enough force on that scale to get the truth to tip in the other direction
if you don’t have that amount it’s not going to tip all right so individual
behavioral choices whether either they are either based in harmony with natural
law or opposition to natural law they combine in their energy and effect and
and in the aggregate, meaning in the sum total,
they influence the quality of the manifested,
shared human experience.
That’s how reality is created.
We’re not, very contradictory to the New Age notion,
each individual’s not creating their own reality.
In the aggregate, humanity is creating, co-creating,
the collective shared experience
that we are all undergoing.
We collectively create our shared experience.
Not each individual creates the reality
that everybody experiences.
Yeah, you do create a microcosmic aspect
of how you experience your life,
whether you’re experiencing self-inflicted suffering,
large amounts of it or not.
That’s how the laws of attraction work
at an individuated level.
But at a mass level, they work in the aggregate.
We need a population who understands
and lives in harmony with natural law.
and numbers are required for that to happen.
This dynamic acts as a perfect expression
of the principle of correspondence.
As above, so below.
As below, so above.
As the individuated units of consciousness
are co-creating reality,
so the macrocosmic reality shall become
and shall be experienced.
Decisively, contrary to the New Age view,
in order for a quantum shift to take place,
numbers are required.
So what is the true great work?
The true great work can only be performed
after one has already realized the truth
regarding natural law and brought one’s self,
one’s own actions into alignment with natural law.
That’s when it begins because once you do that
and you’re no longer in that internal contradiction
or opposition, that’s when you can legitimately
start teaching it to other people
because you know it deeply enough
and you’ve actually aligned your behavior to it.
So the true great work is what comes after that,
and here’s what it is.
This is actually what the true great work is now.
It is the arduous task of influencing other people
to go through the very same process of change,
of positive change in consciousness
that you have gone through.
It is to help them to realize that in supporting
and condoning the legitimacy of authority and government,
in other words, man’s law,
that what they have actually been supporting
and condoning is the legitimacy of slavery
and that they were immoral for having done so.
Now that is hard work
because people don’t want to hear this.
They want to believe what they want to believe.
They want to be true what they want to be true.
They filter their perceptions through those lenses.
In short, what the true great work comes down to
is to actually get people to abandon their religions,
their false religions, really,
I should make this slide say,
the false and dogmatic beliefs
which hold back the progress of consciousness
by impeding the reception of truth and natural law.
They’re calcified religious belief systems.
That’s what has to be broken down and abandoned.
Carl Jung described the great work beautifully.
I consider him a modern-day alchemist,
as I consider many other teachers of the great work.
He said, one does not become enlightened
by imagining figures of light,
but by making the darkness conscious.
Making the darkness conscious.
Not wishing for it to become conscious,
not meditating upon it,
by making it happen through an act of will.
And that can only be done
if enough people are doing the great work, okay?
This latter procedure that he’s just described,
says, however, is disagreeable and therefore not popular. So few people are doing this work.
The answer is to actually become the teacher. I don’t do this because I want a lot of people to
be students and follow what I’m saying. I could care less whether you follow me. Believe me,
I’m telling you the wrong thing to do would be to follow me. That’s a bad example. You follow me,
you’re going to go down a deep path of suffering for many, many years before you come out of it.
it would be a bad choice. I’m telling you to follow truth. To know truth has nothing to do
with me. All right? When people hear that’s what the great work is, to help change other people’s
minds, once you change your own, it’s like this. Let me run away from that as fast as possible.
Are you crazy? You want me to do what? That’s the hardest thing there is to do. Exactly. That’s why
so few people are doing it. Many hands make light work. If we had more people involved in the effort,
it might go smoother. It might go faster. Jefferson said, educate and inform the whole
mass of people. That is the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty. Education
is the answer. Researcher Donald McIlvaney said in his book, Toward a New World Order,
in every declining civilization, there is a small remnant of people who adhere to the right
against the wrong, who recognize the difference between good and evil, and who will take an active
stand for the former against the latter. There’s a small group who can still think and discern for
themselves and who will courageously take a stand against the political, social, moral, and spiritual
decay of their day. Brilliant. The words that are attributed to Jesus in the Gospel of Matthew,
and many people will never have heard this quote, he says, do not suppose that I have come to bring
peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to turn a man against
his father, a daughter against her mother, a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law.
A man’s enemies will be the members of his own household. We’re going to talk about who the
enemy really is. Anyone who loves his father or mother more than me is not worthy of me. Anyone
who loves his son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. And anyone who does not take his
cross and follow me is not worthy of me. Whoever finds his life will lose it, and whoever loses
his life for my sake will find it. These are words attributed by Jesus, but what you want to put in
place of Jesus is the word truth, the way, the truth, the light, knowledge, knowledge of natural
law, Christ consciousness, okay? He’s telling you there are going to be people in your own family
that aren’t going to align themselves with right over wrong. They’re going to continue to choose
slavery. They’re going to continue to advocate slavery. These aren’t people who you want to
continue to align yourself with if you have made an effort to truly explain what’s really taking
place. See, this is the concept of true forgiveness and turning the other cheek. It doesn’t mean
turn the other cheek and continue to ignore evil and excuse evil indefinitely while it destroys
you. It means you have to give people who you’re close with and you have an affinity with more
chances than you would give just the you know at somebody who you don’t know to
learn the truth it’s like saying oh because I really care about this person
personally I’m gonna keep going back keep going back keep going back and I’m
gonna keep hitting them with the truth and eventually if they come over to the
side of truth and right fine but what are you saying here is eventually this
spiritual war is going to go hot so to speak and the people even who are closest
to us if they don’t align themselves with right are the people who are
ultimately continuing the evil in the world. They’re the real spiritual enemy. What will this
battle really be against, this spiritual war? Well, I say it will really actually be against
inner demons that exist in the psyche of mankind. And these inner demons are egos that are hardened
into what I’ve referred to as negative knowledge, emotional mind control, and the fear of true
freedom. So negative knowledge is the concept that somebody already knows. They don’t want to
look at something because, hey, I already know what’s really going on, okay? It’s the illusion
of knowledge. The greatest enemy may not be ignorance, but rather the illusion of actual
knowledge. And people don’t have the truth. And not only don’t they have the truth, so they’re
at zero there, right? They’re at the zero point there because they haven’t really started looking
in the truth for themselves, but they’re attached to all this stuff that isn’t true.
so that puts them in the negative they got to do work to get back to zero of knowing nothing
that’s why i call it negative knowledge got to do hard work to get back to a clean slate
to start taking in some good stuff many people are in that state and the people who are in that
state largely are the overly intellectual the super left-brained the left-brained prison folks
emotional mind control is the second inner demon you know i i encounter this all the time through
people with my work, because many people don’t have the thick skin to listen to somebody like
me. And that’s okay. That’s all right. Again, what Art talked about is that in the ancient
traditions, they talked about reserve the meat for the strong men and furnish the milk for the
babies. All right? I’m not here to convert the babies. I don’t have the patience for that.
I don’t have the energy for that. What I’m trying to do is get the other teachers ready who might
have the energy and patience for that because that’s not me and i’m being 100 perfectly honest
with you that that’s not me that’s not i’m i’m not here to do that okay i’m hoping to bring some
other people that are most of the way there all the way there so they can start doing that on a
wider scale you know they’re going to be the people who are going to work with people like that not me
i’m just being honest with you about it emotional mind control comes in a couple of forms well if
this is unpleasant the new age variant is this right here if it’s unpleasant i don’t want to
hear it i don’t want to see it and i certainly won’t want to tell others about it see no evil
hear no evil speak no evil i’ll just ignore it and it’ll go away on its own well what happens
when you do that with any kind of a sickness or a problem does it does it get better it gets worse
the second form of emotional mind control is people have a problem hearing truth because
they don’t like or prefer the way it’s delivered i’m not going to stop delivering truth the way
I deliver. This is my style. I like my style personally. I don’t think I have a problem at
all in the way I present. I listen back to my presentations and I don’t totally pat myself on
the back, but I say, I did a damn good job there. I’m proud of how I did personally. I’m making an
honest assessment about how I present. And again, I realize my presentation style is mostly for the
thick skin. It’s not for the people with super delicate sensibilities. So be it. That’s not
really who i’m trying to reach i’m trying to do vertical integration not horizontal integration
you know build up the community of people who really get it and they can start propagating it
to the masses this concept is about you know the attractive newscaster on the on the nightly news
she can whisper sweet nothings in your ear all night with the blue frequencies behind her you
know okay and say two plus two equals five two plus two equals five and she’s gonna get a lot
of people to believe that nonsense right but the person who’s actually telling
you the truth that you might not like the sound of his voice you might not
like the harshness that he comes to you with the truth with the truth with he
might be screaming through a bullhorn and saying hey you’re in danger you are
actively in danger there is an imperative here okay there is a time
consideration here you don’t have all the time in the world to correct this
all right people say well I don’t like the way he said that that comes off as
negative to me I think he’s fear-mongering or making a bigger deal
out of this than it is they’re not interested in the content the actual
information they’re saying the way that was said offended me I don’t prefer the
sound of his voice or the Tony just took well does that have any damn thing to do
with whether the information was true or not the people who are in this mind
state are under emotional mind control. They believe you can determine the veracity of
informational content based upon how it makes you feel. And this is a logical fallacy. That cannot
be done. You cannot think with the emotions. And I’m not telling you to disregard the emotions.
They’re unbelievably important. They are our compass for morality in our lives. They’re the
compass through which we should set the direction of our behavior. But you can’t come to determine
and analyze and break down what’s true or not and make a filtering system based on just how
the information made you feel when you heard it, okay? You have to actually think with the mind,
with both hemispheres of the brain, with true intelligence to come to filter and determine
and what’s true. No matter how much anybody wants to give you that soft, sweet, pleasant,
emotional voice, that person’s still lying to you. And no matter how much the person who comes
with an abrasive, harsh, nasty, or scratchy voice might keep telling you two plus two equals four
and you don’t personally like their tone, guess what, folks? It still equals four at all times
and places. That’s the truth. No amount of pleasantry or wrapping up the lie is ever going
to make this statement on the left here true, ever. But yet, that’s what people would rather
prefer to hear if it’s told to them in a nice, pleasant tone. Truth is belligerent, as I said
at the beginning of the presentation. It is, by its very nature, at war with the forces of falsehood
and deceit. Brecht. We literally believe that we are in the right to ignore a message of truth
if the messenger is somehow distasteful to us.
I would argue this to be a symptom of total madness.
That’s an anonymous quote I also found on a forum.
And that’s a great piece of wisdom.
That’s a gem of wisdom right there.
It is total madness to disregard truth
just because we don’t like the way it was said.
It’s called emotional mind control.
It’s been a big part of my work
that I’ve tried to explain to people.
Where does the fear of true freedom come from?
All right, and this is gonna lead into my future work,
which is a whole nother series of presentations.
I’m going to go deeply into this in the future. I call it’s very difficult to see here. There’s
actually a tree there. It’s kind of in a deep red because I’m going to put some text over top of it.
I should have started it in a more bright red and then faded into the background. But forgive that
on this slide. You can look it up here at the top of the tree. There’s the leaves. All right.
The leaves are one’s refusal to own their own personal responsibility. Now, you would think,
oh, that’s way down at the root. No, that’s the symptom that’s manifesting up at the top of the
tree. That’s actually the leaves on the tree, the leaves and the twigs, right? Then we get down to
the big branches and the trunk of the tree. We’re getting closer to the heart of the real
psychological issues that are at work driving the negative aspect of the problem, all right?
And this we’ve already talked about, self-loathing due to lack of self-respect. Now, what am I really
describing here? What have we actually been describing? What kind of people want to live in
perpetual refusal to own personal responsibility because they have some nested traumatic issues
that have led to self-loathing and lack of self-respect? What am I really describing there?
What? Well, yes, it’s a slave mindset, but there’s something else that I’m describing. What kind of
person, isn’t it? A child. Thank you. We’re talking about people who are psychologically,
emotionally, and spiritually immature. They have not grown up. They have not accepted personal
responsibility, which is a hallmark of true adulthood or maturity. And this is due to the
trauma that they’ve undergone that’s led to self-loathing, okay, and the lack of self-respect,
which is why they don’t want personal responsibility. They want to remain an eternal child.
now let’s find out what is at the root of this tree of evil because until we go
into this space into this causal factor of these other manifesting psychological
conditions we’re not actually hitting the actual root of the problem if a
child doesn’t like themselves they hate themselves they feel they’re not good
enough. They’re not worthy. They have all these imagined feelings of inadequacy and self-loathing,
okay? And that’s expressing their refusal to grow up and take personal responsibility for
themselves in their adulthood. What kind of trauma specifically has that child more likely than not
psychologically undergone? They’ve gone through a specific type of childhood trauma. And I would
argue that most people on earth have gone through this type of trauma. And that type of trauma is
called abandonment. The human species is suffering from very deeply seated parental abandonment
issues that lie at the very core of the psychological condition that we call the human
condition. Until we deal with that nested psychological trauma that has been created
through abandonment issues, we’re not hitting the roots of the tree of evil. We’re not getting down
to the very core issue that needs to be understood. My future work, I’m going to be presenting this on
December 12th in Philadelphia for anybody who’s in the Philadelphia area. It’s going to be what I
would call a synthesis, an explanatory synthesis of why this is the root psychological condition
of humanity. I call it cosmic abandonment. And this is going to be one of the biggest,
biggest aspects of the next part of my work. I think it’s going to really set my work apart
from others in the truth and freedom community and the alternative research community.
Until we wrestle with those psychological abandonment issues, we’re not getting to the
heart of what’s causing these other problems in the human psyche, like self-loathing,
the lack of the development of self-respect and the refusal to own the responsibility for one’s
own actions. And I’m going to connect this with human origins. And I’m going to make the case
that it has always been like that. It has always been like that. We have been children on this
planet since we have been on this planet. And we have never actually psychically, psychologically,
and emotionally and spiritually grown up because as a species we have undergone
what I term cosmic abandonment so that’s going to be coming up in in future
aspects of my work what will be required on the part of those performing this
great work and you know it is like Sisyphus rolling that boulder up the
hill we just got to get it up to the top and give it that one last push so we
don’t to keep doing it again who knows how many times we’ve already tried to do
this, and it’s ended in failure. We need the knowledge of the real enemy, the real enemy,
okay? And we’ll get to what that is. We need to devote ourselves to service to truth,
not even service to humanity. I’m not saying that’s not a great virtue to have and enact.
I’m telling you, we need to go beyond that. This isn’t about service to me, you, or any other
individual. It’s about service to truth and principles, first and foremost. And we need
courage and persistence, and then we need practical real-world skills. The knowledge of the real enemy
needs to ultimately come first. And this isn’t it, folks. This priest class that goes and meets and
has the rituals at Bohemian Grove, I’m not telling you they’re not evil. I’m not telling you they’re
not psychopaths. I’m not telling you that we don’t need people like that in the world, okay? I’m
telling you that in this spiritual war, this is a tiny, tiny, tiny, tiny, insignificant, as far as
numbers are concerned, fraction of the totality of the human population, that could not possibly
control the minds and the behaviors, and therefore the behaviors, of the masses of people without our
compliance, without our ignorance. So while I’m not telling you I like these people, do I have
respect for them as an opponent? Oh yeah, you damn well better believe I do. I don’t underestimate
these psychopaths, not a bit. You want to know why I worked with them? I know what their will is like.
I know what their intellect is like. And I’m telling you, don’t underestimate either one.
I’m telling you don’t underestimate their care
They don’t have like I said, they don’t have care in the terms of compassion and the normal range of human emotions like we do
But don’t think that means they don’t have care
They deeply care about what they’re enacting what their agenda is and they have the will to carry it out
And they’re not slowing down. They’re unified. They’re on a unified front. They’re on the same page
Believe it know it. I’m not telling you that from like I said reading about it or book knowledge
I’ve been around these psychopaths. I haven’t specifically been to this psychopathic gathering,
but I’ve been around them. Enough. That’s not the real enemy, that is. The sleeping masses,
hypnotized masses, they’re your enemy. See, people will say the Illuminati enslaves humanity.
No, it doesn’t. Humanity enslaves the real Illuminati. Think about that for a little bit.
Do those psychopaths in the last slide really enslave us? And first of all, people who call
in the Illuminati. There’s no such thing. Illuminati means that you’re enlightened,
the illuminated ones. You want to know who’s the enlightened ones? They’re in this room.
We’re the Illuminati. The people who know what I’m talking about here are the Illuminati. They’re
the illuminated ones. They’re the ones with the light. They’re the ones with the real knowledge,
okay? They want to refer to themselves as the enlightened ones. They might have the dark sun,
but they don’t have the true sun, you know? They’re imbued with the black sun. That means
it’s all intellectual knowledge and then you’re applying it for the totally immoral wrong reasons
which is to control and manipulate other people there’s nothing illuminated about that so the
real illuminati they’re not the enslavers of humanity the dark illuminati are not the
enslavers of humanity either humanity enslaves itself and they’re enslaving the true illuminati
the teachers who are actually living under the conditions of slavery because they’re here
with the ignorant people that’s who’s being enslaved by humanity humanity are
the enslavers and this is another thing it’s highly unpopular people don’t want
to hear it they want to think we’re powerless victims there’s no choice
involved here this is something that’s just being done to us okay and I’m here
to tell you free will is always in existence and it’s a matter of changing
one’s thoughts and therefore changing one’s choices and that’s our own
personal responsibility that can never be given away or shirked or shunned you
are always responsible for what we’re doing. Service to truth is required. Truth itself is
eternal, can never be destroyed. But you know what? Humanity can be destroyed. We can be destroyed
when we refuse to act in service to truth as her defenders. People say, oh, truth doesn’t need to
be defended. Nonsense. Truth needs to be defended at all times and places because the attack on it
is never ending and nonstop, continuous. And if we don’t come to her defense, you know what happens?
the voice of untruth and deception and evil and mind control rules the day and the voice of truth
doesn’t get heard because the truth itself doesn’t have a physical voice in the physical domain
you know we have to be its mediums and we have to be its voice it’s possible for us to co-create a
positive outcome in this scenario but this can only be accomplished if we care enough to learn
the truth ourselves and then we develop the courage to continuously speak it to other people
until our voice of truth becomes a non-stop chorus
like the voice of lies and deception
and mind control has been for millennia on this planet.
Courage is required.
Samuel Adams encapsulated this brilliantly.
He said, the liberties of our countries
are worth defending at all hazards.
It is our duty to defend them against all attacks.
It will bring a mark of everlasting infamy
on the present generation.
if we should suffer them to be wrested from us
by violence without any struggle
or to be cheated out of them
by the artifices of designing men.
If you love wealth greater than liberty,
if you love the tranquility of servitude
greater than the animating contest for freedom,
then go home from us in peace.
We seek not your counsel nor your arms.
Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you.
may your chains set lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you are ever our countrymen
now that’s about as powerful as it gets as far as i’m concerned because he’s telling you if your
allegiance isn’t to the truth and freedom i don’t want to know you i don’t want to know you and i
we hope history forgets that you ever were with us at this time and place in history and because
you deserve to be forgotten that’s what he’s saying here you know i i couldn’t agree more
Persistence is required, constant effort.
We are the actual vehicles by which truth operates
in the world, therefore it is our shared responsibility
at this time to help to awaken others
by continuously speaking the truth,
even if we feel burdened by this task,
even if we feel no one is listening,
and even if it makes all involved
in this process feel uncomfortable.
It’s not about feeling comfort, folks.
It’s not about staying complacent.
It’s about shaking things up,
making people feel uncomfortable.
Who said, whoever told anybody
that the truth would make you all warm and fuzzy inside?
Whoever told anybody that?
Why do people want to believe that?
Whoever said that that was the case?
The truth is horrible,
and yet needs to be embraced as a lover, okay?
With dedication to it, even in its full horror.
Thomas Paine, who I feel is the most enlightened person
on the continent at the time
of the American Revolution, personally,
he’s one of my personal heroes,
and walked in the vicinity where I walk sometimes now.
He said, these are the times that try men’s souls.
The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot
will, in this crisis, shrink from the service
of his country, but he that stands it now
deserves the love and thanks of man and woman.
Tyranny like hell is not easily conquered,
yet we have this consolation with us,
that the harder the conflict,
the more glorious the triumph.
I think he was one of the true anarchists
that was living amongst us in the colonial days.
Words attributed to the Buddha, Siddhartha Gautama,
he said, there are only two mistakes
that one can ever make on the path to truth,
not starting and not going all the way, all the way.
I wrap up a lot of my podcasts with this quote
I love it so much it’s about persistence it’s not about saying hey I went this far and now I’m
uncomfortable to see the rest of the picture I made it three quarters up the mountain that’s
far enough let me set up my base camp here I’ll pitch my tent and I’m staying here no farther I
don’t want to see the peak okay until we become fully enlightened and go all the way to the summit
don’t expect things to change don’t expect them to get better the truth has to be taken in in its
fullness. We need real world practical skills. You know, this isn’t just about, oh, I know this now
and I don’t actually need any skills. Okay. To communicate truth, skill is required. Knowledge
is required. Okay. To reach a good amount of people. Yeah. You can just talk to the people
around you. You can communicate, you know, to a small fraction of people that way. I’m not saying
don’t do that. Even if you don’t have these other skills, I’m saying, if you want to get it out in
a big way to the masses of people and in the new form of media which is doing things like this
through the correct and positive and empowering use of technology people want to say oh there’s
no technology is not not you know there’s no role for it we got to get rid of technology
technology is a thing that improves life at every scale and level it’s a tool it’s how it’s used
exactly okay we’re using technology for a powerful and enlightening purpose right now and that’s how
it’s intended use. It’s to serve humanity and to serve truth, okay? So real world skills in the
technological era, I feel are absolutely required, and here’s some of them. You need good organizational
skills, you know? Like, hey, Art and Chris did this right today. They set this up right, you know? I’ve
seen people set things up real badly. I’ve seen it done the correct way, which is this way. And Richard
and Lisa, they’ve done a brilliant job here getting this all on film, and you know, this will be
going online and reaching a ton a real wider base of people as a result all
right so you need organizational skills some people are better than that with
others I’m pretty good with organization I feel I have good powerful
organization skills communication skills you need to have a way with words you
need to have a good vocabulary you need to organize words correctly you need to
be able to communicate concepts in often a very linear fashion to people so that
that they can readily absorb it easily, you know?
If you’re all over the place,
they’re not gonna get the concept.
You need graphic design skills in many cases, you know?
I couldn’t build a presentation like this
without my background in graphic design.
And, you know, thank God I have it.
You know, it’s like I got jobs like I did in the past
and sort of they prepared me for everything
that I was gonna do in my future.
Synchromystically worked out like that.
But, you know, you at least gotta know
how to lay out a flyer, folks.
How many people here can lay out a simple flyer?
That’s awesome.
I’m so highly impressed by that.
I’m telling you, I’ve asked people that
in other presentations, like two people raised their hand.
That’s awesome, okay?
You should be proud of that.
Presentation skills, like putting something
like this together.
How many people have basic presentation skills
with a computer?
All right, a little less, but not bad either.
I’m impressed, okay?
Audio skills.
Sometimes you gotta work with audio,
podcast audio, et cetera.
Video, video editing skills.
I know Rich is a master at that.
Website development, you know, this was laborious in the past, just ten years ago.
We have free open source content management systems now that make this almost a breeze.
You know, it’s just somewhat, a little bit of a learning curve, but once you get there,
hey, you’re off to the races.
You can maintain multiple websites then, right?
So how many people can build a simple website by a show of hands?
That’s also awesome.
I mean, you know, kudos, whoever hates that word, you know, whatever.
I’m telling you, that’s impressive.
For an amount of people in one room
to have all those skills, I’m impressed.
It’s very rare, all right?
Networking skills, I mean literally like people skills.
I’m weak on this, all right?
I can do it, I don’t like doing it.
I don’t like marketing and promotion either.
I’m not a good marketer of my work.
I’m trying to get better at that,
but I need some work with that.
And maybe there’s people that can help me with that.
but I have a good chunk of all these skills.
I could do all of them.
I’m not so good on the last two.
I need more work.
But if most of us don’t have these skills,
we’re not gonna be reaching the optimum number of people.
We need to become the new media that is dedicated to truth
and put that out there for other people’s consumption
and other people’s edification, all right?
We are the answer.
We are the illuminators,
the ones who will help to enlighten other people
once we’ve taken this knowledge into ourselves.
And then that’s only the beginning, folks.
You gotta put it back out there.
I tell people the story.
I had all this knowledge for a long time,
sitting on it, doing nothing with it, just taking more in.
Oh, I wanna make sure I got it all right.
I wanna make sure I got the whole picture.
I go to a meeting in the state of Virginia.
Virginia, virgin, the goddess, okay?
Care, very synchronistic.
A woman comes up to me, she says,
You’re one of the most knowledgeable people I’ve come across.
What are you doing?
So what do you mean, what am I doing?
She said, I mean, what are you doing
with all the knowledge you have?
You’re doing lectures, presentations, videos, audio.
What are you doing?
I’m not doing any of those things.
I’m just taking a lot more in, downloading a lot more videos.
She goes like this, and it’s just so matter-of-factly
and harshly, what makes you think
you have the right to do that?
What makes you think you can keep taking all of this in,
all of this in, all of this in,
and not put any of it back out.
What makes you think you even have a right to do that?
I was like, it was like somebody hit me in the face.
She said, this was her phrase.
She said, I’ll never forget it.
You’re Niagara Falls in a water balloon.
You’re taking all this in and all this pressure,
pressure, pressure building up.
It’s got no outlet.
It’s gonna burst.
She said, you have to put an outlet valve
on that knowledge and let it flow out of you
and go out to others and then more will come in.
right now there’s no pressure release valve your niagara falls in a water balloon it’s like a truck
ran me over you know literally like i got hit by a truck i i came up with the idea for what on earth
is happening like a couple weeks after that because i can so i can think about all i can
think about is what she said kept echoing in my head what makes you think you have a right to do
that and didn’t say it nice like said it like you know uh you’re not doing the right thing here
get up off your ass and do something that was the tone it was set in and i totally appreciate it
you know who knows man if that wasn’t said to me at that time I might not be
doing anything might not have done a thing you never know I like to think at
some point I would have but at the crossroads this is the last section then
we’ll get to some questions quote by buck our Buckminster Fuller the Dark
Ages still reign over all of humanity and the depth and persistence of this
domination are only now becoming clear this Dark Ages prison has no steel bars
no chains or locks. Instead, it is locked by misorientation and built upon misinformation.
Caught up in a plethora of conditioned reflexes and driven by the human ego,
both warden and prisoner attempt meagerly to compete with God. All are intractically skeptical
of what they do not understand. We are powerfully imprisoned in these dark ages simply by the terms
in which we have been conditioned to think the conditioning of our thought is what has kept us
in this prison and only now the the actual depth of the dark ages that we are in are starting to
become clear to some people we are in the time that i call the apocalypse and actually i want
to start rephrasing this i want to actually explain to people we’re not in the apocalypse anymore
we are now in post-apocalyptic times we are living in post-apocalypse the apocalypse has
already occurred it’s over we are living in the time after the apocalypse and what do i mean by
that well we gotta look at the meaning of the word okay from the greek prefix apo which means
away from off of or removed from and then the greek verb caliptine which means to cover
or to conceal or to hide so apocalypse means literally to take the cover off of to remove
the veil from or to take something out of hiding well ladies and gentlemen another big surprise
the veil has already been lifted the truth is already out there it’s out the truth about what’s
going on here and has been going on here on the earth is out it has been de-occulted not just by
me by many many other researchers okay there’s a laundry list of them out on my website and i talk
about in the podcasts all right it’s all out there um it literally means to reveal or to take out of
hiding the apocalypse is the great revealing of the truth to the masses of people or it is what
i simply refer to as the process of de-occulting the truth removing it from being hidden what
What humanity needs to do is make what I call the cosmic apology, and I’ll get to what
that means.
See these words right here, I was wrong?
That’s the most powerful phrase that can ever be said by a human being.
The second most powerful phrase I would say, I would acknowledge, is I love you.
But this is more powerful than even that, because this is about internal change, not
just a dynamic or an interaction or a relationship with another.
This is about an internal metamorphosis.
you say these words, this is the phrase of all power. No is the word of all power by which we
reclaim our power. But this is the phrase of power. All right. Okay. The word apology comes
from Greek. Apo, meaning away from, off of, or removed from, as we’ve just seen. And the Greek
noun logos logos means word okay so hence an apology it literally means to
go away from the word or to give back the word okay you are taking it back so
if I make an apology I said something I didn’t really mean it or I want to
retract it an apology means let me take back what I just said okay I’m taking it
back, I’m removing the word, all right? I’m going away from the former word or phrase that I just
said. That’s an apology in standard colloquial English understanding sense, all right? Let’s
look at what I call the cosmic apology and where this term really comes from, what it really means.
See, the Greek noun logos, which is written there in Greek script, which means word in Greek,
it comes from the greek verb lego all right lego in greek means to speak or to say it’s where we
get the english word lexicon from all right the latin noun lex legis is related to the greek verb
lego to say again because who put the laws into manifestation the creator did how did the man
how did the creator manifest the physical universe and all the laws spoke it into existence
reality and truth are spoken into existence by the power of vibration the
vibratory power of voice ok so the Creator created the universe by the
phrase fiat looks in Latin means let there be light ok the latin noun Lex
legis meaning law is actually derived from this Greek verb Lego meaning to
speaker to say. God and not man is the Logos, the author of law, the one who spoke the law into
existence at the creation of the universe. Because natural law is the boundary conditions of the
manifested reality called the physical universe. These are the boundary conditions which govern it.
Humanity’s work is to learn to listen to God’s word, not man’s word, not man’s law, natural law,
spiritual law moral law god’s law karmic law i don’t care what you want to call it call it
whatever you want okay consequentialism this is the truth that’s what you want to talk about what
all these phrases really mean it all comes back to the word truth that’s it it’s the truth about
what is what’s operating here and humanity needs to align its behavior to this law god’s law natural
law without alignment of its behavior don’t expect to natural law don’t expect a thing to change here
expect it to rapidly grow worse humanity must make a cosmic apology by giving the word okay
which means the authorship of creating law so we think we’re the authors with the authorities
it’s what author means right author what’s another word for author this is just a quick this is how
mind control through words works right an author is a what a writer but what are you saying there
an author who has authority they are authoring something is a writer they are a right r-i-g-h-t
dash e-r okay they’re making it into a right this is what you hear when you hear the word
authority you hear author which means a writer meaning one who makes rights which means someone
who believes they’re God. That’s all this really comes down to. In a nutshell, we’re up against a
class of people who believe that they can be God and own and rule everybody else. That’s all the
dark occult comes down to, folks. People who believe they’re God. Sick, psychopathic lunatics
who think they’re God and are going to rule the hell of the prison world that they’re going to
create, that they call their dark new world order. We need to give the word back. That’s what an
apology is and who it needs to be given back to is the creator of the universe because that’s the
author of the law that’s his rightful owner the word doesn’t belong to us folks the word belongs
to god that’s why it says at the beginning of the biblical text in the beginning was the word
and the word was god you know that’s what the logos is natural law god is law you want the
best definition i could ever give you for the word god law people don’t want to look at it like that
Very few people ever look at it like that.
That’s what the force of creation is.
It’s natural law.
It’s how we co-create our reality,
whether we do it consciously or unconsciously.
This apology is accomplished when we open our minds
and hearts to truth and we start saying the lost word,
no, to evil, to the presence of evil in our lives.
See, this is an initiate inside what was known
as the Jed, or the de-Jed pillars,
depending on how certain people pronounce it.
And these Jed Pillars represent stability and enlightenment,
and they represent the two principles,
the sacred feminine principle of non-aggression
and the sacred masculine principle of self-defense.
The Initiative is the enlightened one
who has incorporated and bridged both pillars
and has come to the place of cosmic illumination,
which is represented by the winged disc of Maat
in the Khamisian tradition,
which is over the lintel between the two pillars.
That wing disc of Maat.
Maat was considered a great mother goddess
in the commission, the ancient Egyptian traditions, okay?
She was the force, she was a personified deity.
You know, the ancient commissions
didn’t actually worship a physical woman.
It’s not what this was.
It was the personification of truth and justice
and order, and natural law
that was encapsulated as the sacred feminine essence.
And she was above all the other deities
in the pantheon of Egyptian deities, of Kameshian deities.
Maat, there was no god or goddess higher.
And how they looked at alignment with Maat
is if you wanted to have order,
and you wanted to avoid chaos,
you learned the teachings of Maat,
because she was the goddess of justice,
and she was the goddess of righteousness.
She was the goddess that brought order
if you aligned yourself to her teachings,
and her teachings were natural law.
So that’s what this is here.
This is saying we need to take away the word.
It’s not saying remain silent and don’t use your voice.
It’s not what it’s ever been saying.
This is a symbolic allegory for the apology, right?
All right. You know what else the G in the middle of the compass is in square is? Apollo G, the sun, the light, the generative principle. Okay. We need to make the Apollo G. All right. That’s what the G in the middle of the compass is in square in allegory also represents.
because one of the big deities, the Greek deities that is often kind of exemplified
in the Freemasonic tradition is Apollo.
He was a sun god, and he was a corollary to Horus in the Egyptian tradition
and Jesus in the Christian tradition, and Mithra in the Persian tradition
and many other sun gods that represented truth and light.
So that’s the middle way, the middle pillar.
that’s what the initiate represents you know i started this presentation with the slide before
we begin now we have begun and it’s up to you to take it further you know what you’ll do with this
knowledge is entirely up to you see this is a painting by alex gray that shows the world view
schism are we going to stay embedded in the left brain and in other forms of imbalance and we’re
going to create the negative world view right or are we going to live in harmony with natural law
which can create this path when we incorporate the creative and nurturing and sacred feminine
aspect of our beings natural law living in harmony with it can only lead to these conditions
freedom peace prosperity the continuation of our species our actual physical survival
and our evolutionary progress in consciousness that’s what living in harmony with natural law
leads to conversely living in opposition to natural law will get us this side of the world
tree it’ll bring this world this hellish world of chaos and destruction because living in opposition
to natural law can only lead to these states control enslavement war chaos evolutionary
stagnation and ultimately the extinction of our species which will we choose you know that’s still
up in the air i can’t tell you that only each individual can make that decision for themselves
and then that will play out in the aggregate in the mass consciousness the numbers thomas
Jefferson said, a free people claim their rights as derived from the laws of nature. And this was
also embedded in the Declaration of Independence, the laws of nature and of nature’s God, and not
as the gift of their magistrates. John Locke said, the natural liberty of man is to be free from any
superior power on earth and not to be under the will or legislative authority of man, but only to
have the law of nature for his rule. Former Grand Master of the Order of the
Rose Cross, the Rosicrucian tradition, Francis Bacon said, nature to be
commanded must first be obeyed. If we want the forces of the cosmos on our
side, we have to learn and adhere to the principles of natural law. If we do not
align our behavior to that, nature will not stand with us. It will continuously
stand against us and it will itself create more strife and suffering in our lives and we certainly
won’t command it we won’t command its forces like with things like free energy used for any positive
purpose it’ll only be used for destructive purposes the uh psychologist alfred adler said there is a
law that man should love his neighbor as himself and he’s referring of course here to the golden
rule. In a few hundred years, it should be as natural to mankind as breathing or the upright
gate. But if he does not learn it, he must perish. And you know, folks, I would really hope this is
going to take less than a few hundred years. But based on where we’re at, I’m not so sure,
you know. I think we could do it a lot faster than that if we accept the key that’s been shown
here today that, as I said before, has the power to unlock all the locks on all the doors to all
the cages. And that’s what the knowledge of natural law comprises. Will we make the choice
to climb the ladder of consciousness through an act of our own free will, choice, and effort?
It’s not a simple climb. I mean, it’s a difficult climb. It’s not overly complicated to learn these
concepts, to learn these truths. It involves abandoning many things that we’ve already been
conditioned with that don’t serve who we are. Okay. But I’m not telling you it’s going to be
easy. All right. It involves a lot of deep introspective work. But if we do it, we can step
out of the prison that we’ve imposed upon ourselves by balancing the sacred feminine
and masculine forces within each one of us. And by recognizing our own inherent sovereignty
and that there is no legitimacy and never has been any legitimacy to slavery and control and
the external rulership of human beings as subjects. That recognition of sovereignty has to go hand in
hand with our knowledge of natural law. It’s a totally integrated component of it. This was the
title slide. This card, this tarot card was on the title slide. When you understand, and I’ve talked
about this in some of my work online. When you understand the deep connection to the
tarot tradition and other mystery tradition teachings, specifically its very deep interwoven
relationship to the Kabbalistic tradition of the Middle Eastern mystery traditions,
you understand that this card right here actually represents the will of creation and what creation
itself what the the mind of the universe itself ultimately wants to manifest in physical reality
not in some other worldly dream world or fantasy realm or spiritual reality that is to come or not
come right here in the physical domain which is not separate and distinct from the spiritual domain
they are one in the same this card is known as the justice card okay and it’s based on the latin
word yus which means right or law okay that’s where we get the english word justice this card
represents balance between the pillars as you see on the right side of the king holding the sword
of truth in hand and the scales of truth and justice have been perfectly balanced and are in
other hand and it represents sovereignty and it represents alignment with natural law and most of
all it represents alignment with truth and the manifestation of order that can only happen when
we align our behaviors to the principles of natural law only then will we see the manifestation that
that the universe is itself wishing for us
and trying to help us create, which is justice and order.
If we let go of the things that are holding us back
and break our mental chains of bondage,
we can create a world that is based in actual real freedom.
It is possible.
I’m not telling you it’s not gonna be arduous work
or a difficult journey, but it can be done, okay?
If we choose to do that, we’re gonna see advances
and things that are going to be created,
that the world is going to look so drastically different
if we go down that middle path to the truth
and to order and to justice
through the understanding of natural law
and actually applying it and living it in our lives,
that the changes we’re gonna experience
are gonna be so positive and so transformative
that we can scarcely even imagine
what the world will be like on the other side of that work,
on the other side of that transformation.
Will that be done?
Maybe, maybe not.
The answer will come from what you see
in the reflection of that device right there.
That’s what will determine it, nothing else.
It’s up to each individual.
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you so much
for your kind attention today.
Thank you, thank you, thank you.
I appreciate that.
Finally, this right here, Lex Rex simply means
The law is king.
The law is king.
Lex rex.
That’s my final slide.
Thanks so much.
Let’s do some question and answer.
How much time do we have, by the way?
Did I run way over or did I leave some?
Oh my God.
Hey, I’m very happy that the venue allowed us
to go over by this much, okay?
And that they didn’t just come in and say,
you gotta get out of here.
So I really did wanna leave time for questions,
but I think it would be,
I don’t know if it would be really just, you know,
intrusive and ignorant at this point
to just stay even beyond this time,
so maybe we should start packing it up, all right?
I apologize for going so far over.
I think the information speaks for itself
and is worth it, and I hope I was clarified on that.
Listen, I’ll tell you what.
Anybody has specific questions,
since there’s no time for questions,
let me just get this across, okay?
Since there’s no time for questions,
I’ll make a personal effort,
And I rarely tell people I will respond to email questions.
Tell me specifically that you attended this seminar here today in an email.
And if you have a specific question, get to the specific question quickly in your email
and I will make the time over the next few weeks to try to respond to everybody.
I’ll promise that.
How’s that?
Does that sound okay?
All right.
All right.
Great.
Thank you.
Thank you guys all so much for being here, for staying for the whole thing.
you I’m very impressed with with you guys today you know that takes a
tremendous effort of will and attention so you know thank you thank you guys so
much
Source: Mark Passio